Determining the extent to which what is achieved is the purpose of this evaluation approach
What are Objectives
100
Evaluation at all stages of program development and rational decision making.
What are the distinguishing characteristics
100
Suppressing creativity or innovation is listed as...
What is a limitation
100
The criteria for judging this evaluation approach
What is the use of recognized standards and qualification of experts
100
Reflecting multiple realities, use of inductive reasoning and discovery, firsthand experience on site, involvement of intended users, training intended users are described as what.
What are the distinguishing characteristics
200
Ease of use, simplicity, and a focus on outcomes are just a few
What are the benefits of this approach?
200
In addition to Alkin and Provus who contributed to this approach.
Who is Stufflebeam and Wholey
200
Providing *what* about products in order *to what* about purchases or adoptions
What is information to aid decisions.
200
Along with Eisner, this type of group pioneered this approach
What are Accreditation groups
200
First limitation of this approach
What is non-directive
300
An important limitation
What is oversimplification of evaluation
300
Providing useful information to aid in making decisions
What is the purpose of management evaluation?
300
The proponents of this approach.
Who was Scriven and Komoski
300
The purpose of this evaluation
What is providing professional judgments of quality
300
Focus on description and judgment and emphasis on understanding
What are benefits of this approach
400
These are all valid uses
What is Program development, monitoring participant outcome, needs assessment
400
The second and third benefit of this approach.
What is sensitivity to information needs of those in a leadership position and a systematic approach to evaluation.
400
Past uses of this approach
What are Consumer reports, product development, selection of products for dissemination.
400
In addition to the use of consensus standards this is also a distinguishing characteristic.
What is basing judgments on individual knowledge and experience
400
In addition to Stake, Guba and Linclon, Parlett and Hamilton, and Cousins and Earl, they also worked with this approach.
Who is Patton, MacDonald and Rippey
500
These people pioneered this approach to evaluation?
Who is Tyler, Provos, Metfessel and Michael, Hammond, Popham, Taba, Bloom, Talmage
500
Four limitations of this approach
What is emphasis on organizational efficiency and production model, assumption of orderliness ans predictability in decision making, can be expensive to administer and maintain, and narrow focus on the concerns of leaders.
500
Freedom from bias, technical soundness and defensible criteria used to draw conclusions and make recommendations.
What are criteria for judging evaluations.
500
Five limitations
What is Replicability,
vulnerability to personal bias,
scarcity of supporting documentation to support conclusions,
open to conflict of interest
superficial look at context,
overuse of intuition,
reliance on qualifications of the experts
500
Examination of innovations or change about which little is known and ethnographies of operating programs.