If it sparkles like a state
Property, public function, just compensation, oh my!
Give me rights or give me justice!
Constitutional Hodgepodge
Can I enter the courtroom, please?
100

In this opinion, Justice Black set forth a broad understanding of this doctrine when considering the restriction of First Amendment rights in a small town in Alabama.

Marsh v. Alabama

100

In this 1984 case O’Connor authored the opinion of the Court addressing the constitutionality of the Land Reform Act  

Midkiff v. Hawaii Housing Authority

100

In this case, Kennedy writing for the majority found the Colorado legislature failed to act rationally in passing a constitutional amendment

Romer v. Evans

100

This Article of the Constitution establishes the power of the Supreme Court  

Article 3

100

These three types of injuries are sufficient for standing purposes

an injury to a common law right

an injury to a constitutional right

an injury to a statutory right

200

Poor Ms. Jackson, Justice Rehnquist writing for the majority established an alternate understanding of the state action doctrine in this opinion.

Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison

200

A 1949 Marketing Order was the subject of this case

Horne v. Department of Agriculture

200

These three questions guide the Court when analyzing rational basis cases

What is the legitimate purpose? Is there an actual or conceivable purpose? Was the reasonable relationship between the purpose and the government action?

200

These are the four sources of law

Constitution, Statutes, Regulations and Judicial Opinions

200

The Court has set forth the following rule for third party standing 

Third-party standing is not allowed (two exceptions exist: Plaintiff may assert the rights of third parties, if there is a close relationship between plaintiffs and injured third parties and Plaintiff may assert the rights of third parties, if there are obstacles to a plaintiff asserting his or her own rights

300

This is the only true Constitutional exception to the state action doctrine

The 13th Amendment 

300

The Court has announced three criteria that can guide a regulatory taking case

The economic impact of the regulation on the claimant; the extent to which the regulation has interfered with the investment backed expectations; and the character of the government action

300

This case was simultaneously over- and under-inclusive when it sought to protect against fraud.

United States Department of Agriculture v. Moreno

300

Civil Rights are defined as

Protections against unequal treatment under the law OR deprivation of due process as a result of specific classifications [i.e., race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, socioeconomic status, disability, etc.]

300

In this opinion's concurrence, Justice Jackson set forth zones of presidential authority 

Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer

400

This was the first case to articulate the state action doctrine

Civil Rights Cases

400

This is how the Court measures just compensation

Just compensation measured in terms of loss to the owner, in reasonable market value terms

400

In Village of Arlington Heights, the majority identified four ways in which a plaintiff could prove intent

Statistical data; Pattern of state action; historical background; and legislative or administrative history

400

These are the four areas primary areas of the entanglement doctrine

judicial enforcement, government licensing, and government subsidies

400

In this opinion the Court set forth a bright line rule for political gerrymandering cases responding to open questions in the prior plurality 

Rucho v. Common Cause

500

This case overruled prior decisions protecting 1st amendment right of access to shopping centers

Hudgens v. NLRB

500

The Court has defined economic liberties as

the constitutional rights concerning the ability to enter into contracts; to pursue a trade or profession; and acquire, possess, and convey property

500

In this case, the Court expressly adopts intermediate scrutiny

Craig v. Boren

500

These four areas of the constitution provide protections for economic liberties

Art I Sec. 10 – Contracts Clause

5A– Takings Clause

5A / 14A (no taking without due process of law)

14A due process clause (freedom to contract, freedom to pursue livelihood, freedom to practice profession)

500

In Powell v. McCormack the Court established precedent specific to this issue 

The political question doctrine and self-governance 

M
e
n
u