Author Quotes
Types of Validation
Perspectives
Validation Strategies
Evaluation Criteria
100

This author believes that “validation strategies” are “accepted strategies” used by researchers to disclose the accuracy of their research.

Who is Creswell?

100

This kind of validation is concerned with undecidables, limits, paradoxes, and complexities. It is a movement away from theorizing things and toward providing direct exposure to other voices in an almost unmediated way.

WHAT IS PARALOGIC VALIDATION?

100

This study used the perspective “Parallel, qualitative equivalents to their quantitative counterparts in experimental and survey research”

What is LeCompte & Goetz (1982)

100

A validation strategy where someone who is familiar with the research looks at the work

What is a Peer Review

100

Who came up with the methodological perspective that suggests that only broad, abstract standards are possible for qualitative (and quantitative) research?

Howe and Eisenhardt (1990)

200

This author says that “a description is rich if it provides abundant, interconnected details”.

Who is Stake?

200

This validation is proposed by Lather (1993) and pertains to questioning rapid increases in numbers, crossings, and overlaps without underlying structures or deeply rooted connections. The researcher also questions taxonomies, constructs, and interconnected networks whereby the reader jumps from one assemblage to another and consequently moves from judgment to understanding.

WHAT IS RHIZOMATIC VALIDATION?

200

This study used the perspective that “reconceptualized validity in four types”?

What is Lather (1993)

200

A validation strategy where the researcher adds meticulous details to a work

What is is Generating a rich, thick description

200

This author identifies four criteria for reviewing potential qualitative social science publications.

Who is Richardson?

300

In respecting those aspects of research that are collaborative and egalitarian, this author espouses the importance of “making space for the lifeways of others”.

Who is Lincoln?

300

This type of validation is one of Lathers’ earlier proposals; it involves looking at multiple data sources, methods, and theoretical schemes.

WHAT IS TRIANGULATION?

300

This study “synthesized perspectives of validity, organized into primary criteria and secondary criteria”

What is Whittemore, Chase, & Mandle (2001)

300

A validation strategy that can be aided by documentation. It was also emphasized by Silver Lewins. 

What is Enabling External Audits

300

When evaluating phenomenological works, Creswell refers to the works of these two authors. 

Who are Moustakas and van Manen?

400

These authors discuss the idea of “peer debriefing sessions”, a set of written accounts of peer discussions in research.

Who are Lincoln and Guba?

400

This validation is describes as a “click of recognition” and “yes of course” rather than a “yes but” experience.

WHAT IS FACE VALIDATION?

400

This study is described as the “Use of alternative terms that provide reasonable standards for judging the credibility of qualitative research”

What is Eisner (1991)

400

Two validation strategies which are considered to be the other

What are Peer audits and External Audits

400

This evaluation criteria considers whether or not a piece of work succeeds aesthetically. It should use creative analytical practices, invite interpretive responses, and not be boring. 

What is Aesthetic Merit?

500

This author discusses whether or not findings are “valid”.

Who is Polkinghorne?

500

This type of validation occurs when a researcher sets out to understand more than someone can know and to write more than someone can understand

WHAT IS VOLUPTUOUS VALIDATION?

500

This study has a “use of a metaphorical, reconceptualized form of validity as a crystal Use of authenticity, transgression, and ethical relationship”

What is Richardson & St. Pierre (2005) Lincoln, Lynham, & Guba (2011)

500

Nine strategies used can be attributed to Creswell and Miller. Whittmore and associates organized _ techniques.

Who is 29

500

These names identified the criteria by which one judges the quality of a grounded theory study

Who is Strauss and Corbin (1990)

M
e
n
u