Dangers
BONUS!!!
Christ came not to ______ the law, but to _____ it.
Christ came not to destroy the law, but to fulfill it.
There is no new additional ___ that comes from Jesus.
There is no new additional law that comes from Jesus.
Jesus gave us laws for salvation.
False
If Christ were to give us additional laws, what emotional response would we ultimately have? What response to we have with him as our Savior?
We would have despair, no hope for salvation. Instead, we can rejoice in our freedom.
BONUS!!!
Jesus came to be our ______, not our ___-____.
Jesus came to be our Savior, not our law-giver.
True
How does seeing Christ as a second law-giver take away His glory?
He would no longer be "Savior"
"Any one, therefore, imagining that Christ is a new lawgiver and has brought us new laws _______ the entire ______ _____."
“Any one, therefore, imagining that Christ is a new lawgiver and has brought us new laws cancels the entire Christian religion.”
BONUS!!!
"Believing" is still a work we must accomplish to receive salvation.
False
BONUS!!!
1) Jesus gave us laws to follow.
2) “I have come that they may have life and have it abundantly.” (John 10:10)
How does #2 disprove #1?
"Having life abundantly" is the opposite of being oppressed by laws.
We have ______ _____ to do that ______ that he is the _______.
We have nothing more to do than believe that He is the Savior.
It is not wrong to focus only on the teachings of Jesus.
False. This would produce an incomplete understanding of who Jesus is.
If we see Christ as a second law-giver, how does that rob us of our comfort in Christ?
There is no hope in keeping those laws; we would have to earn salvation, which is impossible. Because of Jesus, our salvation is already won.
Law says, "__ ___" and Jesus says, "I ____ ___ __."
Law says, “do this” and Jesus says, “I have done it.”
Baptism and communion is a law which Jesus institutes, and not following it would be a sin.
????