Validity & Reliability
Measurement & Threats
Diagnostic
Prognostic
Intervention
Systematic Reviews
100

Results from an assessment can predict a future outcome 

Predictive validity

100

A test is not administered as the chance of the condition is remote 

Test threshold

100

The chance that an individual with a prognostic factor will develop an outcome 

Odds ratio

100

Which type of design is considered to have the least amount of bias

Experimental designs RCT best!

100

Systematic reviews that use quantitative methods are referred to as 

Meta-analysis 

200

Scores between different therapists are consistent 

Interrater reliability 

200

A test is not administered as immediate tx is indicated 

treatment threshold 

200

Range of scores within the true score for a variable is estimated to lie within a specified probability 

Confidence interval 

200

Best practice to implement when researchers lose subjects overtime

Intention to treat analysis 

200

Considering gray literature and non-English language publications are ways to counteract

Selection and publication bias

300

A researcher loses subjects during the course of a study

Attrition 

300

A diagnostic test is capable of correctly classifying individuals with the condition of interest ( true positive) 

Sensitivity 

300
What determines if the outcome is not due to chance and truly was significant 

p value < .05

300

What number represents a large effect size

.80 and above

300

To strengthen the validity of a review, researchers should be sure to 

Identify search terms, databases used, and the selection process 

400

How well a new assessment correlates with the gold standard

concurrent validity 

400

A test can correctly identify individuals without the condition (true negatives ) 

Specificity 

400

The process of operationally defining the sample in a study comes from

setting clear inclusion and exclusion criteria

400

The minimal level of change required in an intervention before the outcome would be considered worthwhile

Minimally clinically important difference (MCID)

400

What is the next step after a study is selected to be included in the review process

It should be reviewed for quality and bias using standardized processes and or tools 

500

changes in subjects characteristics overtime

maturation 

500

What likelihood ratio would indicate that a test result is no better than a coin flip ( 50-50) chance

LR= 1

500

A retrospective design that is often used when researchers cannot easily follow subjects over time

Case control design 

500

When determining the difference between groups, what determines the data analysis to be used ( i.e. T-test vs chi square)

The type of data represented by the outcome Parametric (ordinal/ratio) vs nonparametric (ordinal/nominal)

500

A method to depict the results of a systematic review that show differences in likelihood, odds, risk ratios and effect size

Forest plot 

M
e
n
u