Contracts
Torts
Civ Pro
Property
Contracts
100

This case held that substantial performance in a unilateral contract renders the offer irrevocable

Cook v. Coldwell

100

This doctrine from Summers v. Tice applies when multiple negligent defendants caused a risk and the burden shifts to them to identify who caused the harm

Alternative liability / burden shifting

100

Waiving service gives a defendant this many days to respond instead of 21

60 days

100

This type of concurrent estate includes a right of survivorship and requires the four unities of time, title, interest, and possession.

What is a joint tenancy

100

A charitable subscription becomes enforceable when there is both a promise and either consideration or reliance, according to this case

King v. Trustees of Boston University

200

This case involved detrimental reliance where a business incurred expenses during lengthy negotiations, satisfying restatement §90

Pops Cones v. Resort International Hotel

200

In this case, a patient injured while unconscious could hold all medical staff liable because they were in control of the instruments and body

Ybarra v. Spangard

200

This group of defenses must be raised in the first response or they are waived

FRCP 12(b)(2)-(5)

200

This doctrine allows a tenant to terminate a lease if the landlord's wrongful conduct substantially interferes with use and the tenant vacates

constructive eviction
200

This case explains that a past action cannot constitute consideration for a later promise even when moral obligation is invoked

Mills v. Wyman

300

This is the remedy aimed at preventing unjust enrichment by awarding the value of the benefit conferred, not the promise made

restitution 

300

The difference between NIED liability to a direct victim and a bystander

Direct: The emotional distress arises from the defendant's negligence and is owed directly to the plaintiff (mishandling a loved ones medical care) 

Bystander: The plaintiff suffers emotional distress from witnessing harm to a close family member (must be present at the scene) 

300

This type of claim is always permissive and if filed against a co-party

what is a crossclaim

300

Under sawada v. endo, property held in this form is generally immune from creditors of only one spouse

tenancy by the entirety 

300

the UCC §2-710, a seller may recover these damages, which include commercially reasonable charges incurred after the buyer's breach

incidental damages

400

This test determines whether a hybrid contract should be governed by the UCC or by common law

the predominant purpose test

400

This case held that defendants owe no duty to plaintiffs outside the zone of reasonably foreseeable danger.

Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad 

400

What allows non-parties to join a lawsuit as of right or with permission 

FRCP 24

400

this remainder is given to a class of living people whose number may grow, reducing the size of each member's interest

a vested remainder subject to open

400
This test asks whether the promisor requested the occurrence of a condition because it would benefit them -- if so, it is likely consideration rather than a gift

the pennsy supply "benefit to the promisor" test

500

This type of promise appears to bind someone, but actually binds them to nothing

ex. "I promise to buy you lunch if I feel like it." 

an illusory promise

500

This form of comparative negligence reduces a plaintiff's recovery by their percentage of fault and bars recovery if they are 51% or more responsible 

Modified comparative negligence 

500

under this rule, electronically stored information must be produced as kept or in a reasonably usable form

FRCP 34 (e-discovery) 

500

a grant "to A for life, than to B if B becomes president" creates this type of remainder in B

contingent remainder

500

This doctrine prevents a party from denying a promise when the other party reasonably relied on words, conduct, or circumstances that functioned as the equivalent of a promise

equitable estoppel

M
e
n
u