RSVP
This is the first "R" in answering FRQ's.
Re-state the Prompt
Simple definition
Indentify/Define
This FRQ is worth 4 points and asks you to draw a conclusion about a graph
Quantitative Analysis
Supremacy Clause/ Necessary and Proper Clause
McCulloch v Maryland
Equal Protection Clause (racial gerrymandering)
Shaw v Reno
This is the VP in RSVP...
Vanquish Pronouns
requires an exploration of "possible relationships" must include because.
explain
Draw a conclusion
Quantitative Analysis
Clear and Present Danger (Freedom of Speech)
Schenck V. US
Free Exercise Clause
Wisconsin v Yoder
This is the S in RSVP
Skip Lines
A portrayal of your most significant characteristics.
Describe
Checks and Balance FRQ
Concept Application
Equal Protection Clause
Brown v. Board
Establishment Clause
Engel v Vitale
Why do we re-state the prompt?
It helps you answer the verb.
What is the larger meaning in the data in the graph?
Draw a conclusion
You get one point for a clear thesis
Argumentative Essay
6th Amendment
Gideon v Wainwright
Incorporated 2nd Amendment
McDonald v Chicago
What is another FRQ strategy?
Answers will vary. (skip and come back, do not letter!)
To contradict or nullify a previous perspective
Rebut
You must know all of the constitutional principles
SCOTUS Comparison
Equal Protection Clause (quotas unconstitional)
Bakke v California
Prior Restraint is unconstitutional
New York Times v Nixon