1
In the רישא, when did he know that his fruits were wet?
while they were wet
What’s the הלכה in the רישא?
they could become טמא
Translate רמי
asks a contradiction
What’s the הלכה in the סיפא?
they will not become טמא
What is a קרי?
The way the פסוק is read
What is a כתיב?
The way the פסוק is written
In the סיפא, when did he know that his fruits were wet?
after they were dry
How is the פסוק written?
יתן
How is the פסוק read?
יותן
Which part is a קשיא on who?
סיפא on רבא
Name the 7 liquids that can make fruits ready to become טמא
wine, blood, oil, dew, milk, water, honey
What would the הלכה be according to אביי in the סיפא?
not טמא
Explain the 1st קשיא on רבא
He says שלא מדעת is as if he knew about it earlier, so it's as if he knew and was happy that they were wet while wet. So the הלכה in סיפא should be טמא- we see it holds שלא מדעת doesn't work
Explain the 1st תירוץ for רבא
It's written "כי יתן"- he has to put it there, and טל came on its own- that's why not טמא
What would the הלכה be according to רבא in the סיפא?
טמא
Who asks a contradiction between פסוקים?
רב פפא
There is a contradiction between ______ and __________.
יתן and יותן
Explain the Gemara's FINAL תירוץ:
The reading יותן tells me it can get wet on its own, and the written יתן tells me he has to know about it while wet. So even though its שלא מדעת, that's why רבא agrees not טמא- because he didn't know while it was wet
In the הוה אמינא (1st תירוץ) we thought that “יתן” teaches me:
He has to put it there, it can't come on its own
In the מסקנא (2nd תירוץ) we decided that “יתן” teaches me:
he only has to know about it being wet while wet