What information is contained within Section 1?
Indications and Usage
The intracranial response rate was 3x higher with Alunbrig vs. Crizotinib. What was the IC-ORR of Alunbrig and Crizotinib?
78% vs. 26%
What is an appropriate probe after the objection, “I am concerned about the rates of ILD/Pneumonitis” from the Alunbrig Objection Handler.
Have you seen ILD/pneumonitis in your patients treated with Alunbrig?
Approximately how many patients may present with EGFR Exon20 insertions in the United States each year?
2,000-4,000
What is the BIRC assessed mPFS of Alunbrig in ALTA 1L?
24 months
What information is contained within Section 5?
Warnings and Precautions
What does “Alunbrig reduced the risk of death by 57% vs. Crizotinib” translate to?
HR of 0.43
What is an appropriate probe after the objection, “AN ORR of 28% doesn’t seem impressive compared to the results we’ve seen with other targeted therapies” from the Exkivity Objection Handler.
May I ask what type of responses you have typically seen with targeted TKIs in your clinical practice? What do you typically see for duration of response?
Brain mets have been reported in up to what percent of TKI treatment-naive patients with ALK+ mNSCLC?
35%
What was the rate of CPK elevation (all grades) in patients who received Alunbrig in ALTA 1L?
81%
What are the specific populations contained within Section 8 of the EXKIVITY PI?
Pregnancy, Lactation, Females and Males of Reproductive Potential, Pediatric Use, Geriatric Use, Renal Impairment, and Hepatic Impairment.
Finish the claim on Page 1 of the Exkivity CVA, “Exkivity (mobocertinib) is…”
The first and only oral therapy designed to target EGFR Exon20 insertion+ mNSCLC
What is an appropriate probe(s) after the objection, “You don’t have efficacy data in patients after amivantamab” from the Exkivity Objection Handler.
• What sequencing data have you seen for patients with EGFR Exon20 insertion+ mNSCLC?
• What is your current algorithm for treating patients with EGFR Exon20 insertion+ mNSCLC?
Brain mets can result in which of the following 3 things (also located on Page 2 of the Alunbrig 1L CVA)?
Reduced quality of life due to neurological, psychological, and physical impairments, severe symptoms such as headache, seizure, and stroke, and shorter overall survival.
If coadministration of a strong or moderate CYP3A inhibitor is unavoidable, what should the HCP do with the dose of Alunbrig?
Reduce
What section is the MOA in and what is the MOA of Exkivity?
Section 12, Mobocertinib is a kinase inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that irreversibly binds to and inhibits EGFR Exon20 insertion mutations at lower concentrations than wild type (WT) EGFR.
On Page 2 of the Exkivity CVA, Exon20 insertions do what to the size of the ATP drug binding pocket
Reduce
What is the appropriate response to the objection, “Why can’t I use EXKIVITY® (mobocertinib) in the first-line setting like I do with most targeted therapies” from the Exkivity Objection Handler?
What test can identify all EGFR Exon20 insertion+ mNSCLC mutations?
NGS
List all the Warnings and Precautions for Alunbrig
Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)/Pneumonitis, Hypertension, Bradycardia, Visual Disturbance, Creatine Phosphokinase (CPK) Elevation, Pancreatic Enzyme Elevation, Hepatoxicity, Hyperglycemia, Photosensitivity, Embryo-Fetal Toxicity.
In which table can you find the dose modifications for Alunbrig and what is the dose modification for Hypertension?
Table 2
The mPFS in a post hoc subgroup analysis in patients with any brain mets at baseline was what for Alunbrig and what for Crizotinib?
mPFS Alunbrig-24.0 months vs. mPFS Crizotinib- 5.6 months
What is the appropriate probe and response to “Alectinib reported OS data at 5 years. How do the OS data for ALUNBRIG® (brigatinib) compare” from the Alunbrig Objection Handler?
Probe: What has your experience been regarding OS with the TKIs you have prescribed?
Response:
In the final analysis of the ALTA 1L trial—with 40.4 months of median follow-up in the ALUNBRIG arm—OS was assessed in all patients, including those with brain metastases
The 3-year OS rate was 71% (95% CI: 62, 78) with ALUNBRIG and 68% (95% CI: 59, 75) with crizotinib (HR=0.81; 95% CI: 0.53, 1.22; P=0.331)At the time of the final analysis, 47% (n=65/138) of patients in the crizotinib arm crossed over to receive ALUNBRIG. The crossover design means that, as crizotinib patients progress and switch to ALUNBRIG, the OS treatment effect may be diluted
In the final analysis, among patients with measurable brain metastases, ALUNBRIG reduced the risk of death by 57% vs crizotinib despite crossover (HR=0.42; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.89; P=0.020)
How are Exon20 insertions different than other EFGR mutations?
Exon20 insertions change the conformation of EGFR in a way that stabilizes the active form, the Exon20 insertion pushes the c-helix moves inward into an active position
What is the most common adverse reaction in ≥10% of patients who received Alunbrig in ALTA 1L and what was the incidence rate of all grades?
Diarrhea at 53%