Chapter 1
DRIVING BLINDFOLDED
DRIVING BLINDFOLDED
WHEN _____ IS THE SAME AS JUDGMENTS AND OPINIONS
BELIEFS
ARGUMENTS ARE TWO PARTS WHAT ARE THEY?
PREMISE AND CONCLUSION
_____ IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO THE ABILITY TO THINK CRITICALLY
CLARITY OF LANGUAGE
INTERESTED PARTIES SHOULD OR SHOULD NOT BE VIEWED WITH MORE SUSPICION THAN DISINTESTED PARTIES
SHOULD
_____ IS A NEUTRAL OR POSITIVE EXPRESSION USED IN PLACE OF ONE THAT CARRIES NEGATIVE ASSOCIATIONS
_____ IS A SIMPLY A QUESTION
ISSUES
TWO FUNDAMENTAL TYPES OF REASONING ARE?
DEDUCTIVE DEMONSTRATION AND INDUCTIVE SUPPORT
A _____ IS OVERLY GENERAL WHEN IT LACKS SUFFICIENT DETAIL
CLAIM
THE LESS INITIAL PLAUSIBILITY A CLAIM HAD THE MORE OR LESS EXTRAORDINARY IT SEEMS
MORE
"EXCUSE ME, DEAR. I MUST POWDER MY NOSE" WHAT TYPE OF RHETORIC?
EUPHEMISM
_____ PRESENTS A CONSIDERATION FOR ACCEPTING A CLAIM
AN ARGUMENT
AN ARGUMENT IS SOUND IF IT IS VALID AND ITS PREMISE IS _________
TRUE
DEFINITION OF SYNERYM
DEFINITION OF EXAMPLE
ANALYTICAL DEFINITION
IT IS OR IS IT NOT THINKING CRITICALLY TO AUTOMATICALLY ASSUME THE WORST OF SOMEONE
IT IS NOT
KEEP YOUR KID AWAY FROM THAT DOG! DIDN'T YOU KNOW IT WAS A PITBULL. WHAT TYPE OF RHETORIC?
STEREOTYPE
____ IS AN IDEA THAT TRUTH IS RELATIVE TO STANDARDS OF A GIVE CULTURE IS
RELATIVISM
A DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENT IS USED TO DEMONSTRATE OR PROVE CONCLUSION, THIS IS ONLY POSSIBLE IF IT IS _____
SOUND
CRITICAL THINKING DONE ON PAPER IS ALSO KNOWN AS?
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY
DOUBT ABOUT SOUCES FALLS INTO 2 CATEGORIES WHAT ARE THEY
SOURCES KNOWLEDGE OR EXPERTISE
_____ IS AN EXTRAVAGANT OVERSTATEMENT OR EXAGGERATION
HYPERBOLE
_____ IS THE IDEA THAT MORAL OPINIONS SUCH AS JASON SHOULDN’T LIE TO HIS PARENTS IS
MORAL SUBJECTIVISM
A _____ IS USED TO SUPPORT RATHER THAN TO DEMONSTRATE A CONCLUSION
INDUCTIVE ARGUMENT
DEFINE RHETORICAL USE OF DEFINITION
TO EXPRESS OR INFLUENCE ATTITUDE
WHAT REASONABLY JUDGMENTS ABOUT A SOURCE KNOWLEDGE BY CONSIDERING. THERE ARE 5.
EDUCATION
EXPERIENCE
ACCOMPLISHMENT
REPUTATION
POSITION
"OBVIOUSLY THERE IS A GLOBAL WARNING; NO RESPONSIBLE CLIMATE SCIENTIST DISPUTES THAT"
PROOF SURROGATE