דף ז
What does "קרן זבית" exclude?
If someone turns a corner holding a knife out in front of him, and he kills someone on the other side.
True or False? The second version of the disscusion (8b) is regarding shemita.
Correct.
Why are there the same amount of Arei Miklat inside of Eretz Yisroel and in Ever Hayarden?
Because in Gilad there is more killers.
Which three mitzvos do Rav Ami and Rav Asi argue about if zekanim are necessary for them?
What is the story of Achitofel (detailed)?
There was a piece of earthware that said: Do not move me from here, because I am blocking the water in the depths.
Dovid Hamelech took it anyways, and the water started coming up. He said: Who knows if we can write Hashem's name on something and throw it inside to stop the water.
Because no one answered, he said: Whoever knows, but isn't answering, will be choked.
Achitofel made a kal v'chomer: Just like by a sotah Hashem allows it, so too here.
Still, Achitofel later choked himself.
What does "בלי דעת" exclude, and what is the question on it and answer?
With knowledge.
Question: If he killed "with knowledge" he is for sure a killer!
Answer: Someone who thinks that is is matur in this case.
Why is chopping wood for the Mizbayach and sechach not a mitzvah?
Because chopping isn't; having the wood is.
Who do we resolve the contradcition regarding Rabbi Yosei's opinon?
It's two diffrent Rabbi Yosei's.
How would Rav Chama bar Chanina begin this parsha?
"טוב וישר ה' על כן ירוה חטאים בדרך"
If Hashem leads reshaim how much more so the tzaddikim
What is the reasonings of Rabbi Yehudah and Rabbi Meir (if you are allowed to sew your Tefillin with flax)?
The one that says pasul: Because in the same pasuk, a Sefer Torah is mentioned. Just like you can't sew a Sefer Torah with flax, so too with Tefillin.
The one that says kosher: That connection is only that both of the must be created from a kosher animal.
How does Rebbi learn the pasuk, and how does the Rabbanan?
Rebbi: It means a piece of wood from the tree fell.
Rabbanan: It means the metal blade fell out of the wooden axe.
What is the machlokes between the Rabbanan and Rabbi Shimon?
If chenek or hereg is more strict.
What is Rabbi Yehudah and Rabbi Meir's reasoning?
Rabbi Meir: "בלא ראות" exludes a blind person. "בלי דעת" excludes a blind person. Two "excludes" includes.
Rabbi Yehudah: "ואשר יבא את רעהו ביער" includes a blind person. "בלא ראות" excludes a blind person.
Say at least 4 things that must be/not be in/around the Ir Miklat.
Water, market, people in the area around it, people inside the Ir Miklat.
Rabbi Nechemia: You can't sell weapons or hunting tools.
You can't put traps and ropes.
What are the 4 levels that happened to Yehudah (through Moshe Rabbenu's davening)?
1. His bones stopped shaking
2. He entered the Yeshiva in Shamayim
3. He was able to disscus
4. He was able to answer questions
If the rung fell, one tanna says he is chayav and another says he is patur. What are they arguing about? And how we say they agree (1 answer)?
The one that says chayav holds that it's considered going down (the rung is falling down), and the one that says patur holds that it's considered going up (the person is going up).
We can say they agree because:
1. One is talking about galus, and the other about damages.
2. One is talking about when the rung fits into the wood, and the other about when it's wormy.
What can "הכל גולין על ידי ישראל" not be talking about, and what is it?
Is: For example he gave a yid an injury less than the worth of a peruta.
What is Rav Chsida's answer and what doesn't Rav like about it?
Rav Chisda's answer: If a yid goes to galus in a case of going down, he should also. But in a case of going up, when a yid does not go, he should be killed.
Rava: If the yid doesn't go, why should he killed?
What is the reasoning of the second brasia and Rav Huna, and the first brasia?
Second brasia and Rav Huna: The pasuk already says "and he did not hate him from before" - so he is not killed. So why would the pasuk say again "and for him there is no sentence of death"? Rather, it is talking about the goel hadam.
First brasia: The pasuk first says "and he did not hate him from before". This is obviously refering to the accidental killer. So when it says "and for him there is no sentence of death", it is also referring to the accidental killer.
What does Rabbi Yitzchack Napcha say that Rabbi Yehoshua learns from the pasuk "ברוך ה' חילו ופעול ידיו תרצה"?
That a chalal's korbanos are still kosher.
Brasia 1: Chayav - Going down in front of him. Patur - going up behind him.
Brasia 2: Chayav - Going down behind him. Patur - going up in front of him.
Brasia 3: Chayav - Going down in front and behind him.
Brasia 4: Patur - Going up in front and behind him.
What is the Gemara's entire disscusion regarding "if someone throws a stone into the reshus harabim and kills someone, he goes into galus"?
Isn't that a mayzid!?
No, he was destroying his wall.
He still should have checked for people!
It was at night.
He still should have checked!
He was destroying it into a garbadge dump.
If there are people - mayzid! If there aren't - ones!
Many people are there at night, and some by day.
Who do we answer the contradiction of snaping/slipping (רבי שמעון אומר יש שונא גולה..)?
When we say by slipping there is galus, that is according to the Rabbanan, and when we say that there is no galus that is according to Rebbi.
When we say by snaping there is galus that is in a case of a שונא, and when we say there is no galus that is in a case of an אוהב.
What are the 4 interpretations of "ומי ימלל גבורות ה' ישמיע כל תהלתו"?
One who learned much should teach others.
One who loves teachers will have children who are teachers.
One who likes to learn with many people will have a lot of Torah.
If you love to teach in public, you will have a lot of Torah.
Why can't we say that Rav Ami is like Rabbi Yehoshua and Rav Yitzchack Napcha is like Rabbi Eliezer?
Because they are arguing in Rabbi Yehoshua's opinon:
Rav Ami is clearly like him. And Rav Yitzchack Napcha says that Rabbi Yehoshua only says his opinon regarding becoming a chalal.