Basics
Claims
Defenses
Landmark Cases
100

The legal responsibility of manufacturers and sellers for injuries caused by their products

What is product liability?

100

Intentionally lying or hiding information about a products defect is this tort

What is fraudulent misrepresentation?

100

Liability that is imposed even though the manufacturer was not at fault/was not careless:

Strict Liability

100

Explain the case of: MacPherson v Buick Motor Co.

Buick manufactured wheels using wood, thus causing injuries to owners.

Buick lost, liable to consumers for negligence

200
Name 3 groups who can be held responsible for product liability

Manufacturer, Lessor, Retailer, Distributor

200

Failing to exercise due care in design, materials, or manufacturing a product is called:

What is negligence?

200

This defense applies when a consumer knowingly and voluntarily exposed themselves to danger:

What is assumption of risk?

200

Explain the case of Boles v Sun Ergoline Inc

Lady cut her finger in tanning bed. 

The court rejected assumption of risk as a defense because they said manufacturers should still provide safety measures when it´s foreseeable that one may misuse product

300

Product that is so dangerous it threatens a consumer´s safety is called:

Unreasonably dangerous product

300

Name the 3 categories in which a product can be deemed defective?

In it´s manufacturing, design, warning labels

300

Using a product in an unforeseeable way is this defense:

Product misuse

300

Explain the case of Greenman v Yuba Power Products

Even though the manufacturer had their products thoroughly tested, a few may fall through the cracks.  Manufacturers can still be held responsible bc they are the one´s who are profiting/making money

400

Privity of Contract

Doctrine that allows injured consumers to sue even though they did not purchase the items that caused them harm

400

A product that is made correctly but inherently unsafe due to the poor ¨blueprint¨ has this type of defect:

Design Defect

400

If a danger is obvious (sharp knife), this defense applies:

Commonly known dangers

400
Explain the case: Suffolk County Water Authority v Dow Chemical Co.

Market share liability bc plaintiff could not pinpoint where the contamination source was coming from

500

Theory that spreads liability among multiple manufacturers when the exact source of harm can´t be identified.

What is market share liability?

500

Term used to state that a product had improper and unclear safety instructions

Inadequate warning labels

500
When both the plaintiff and defense share fault, damages are reduced to their portion of blame
What is comparative negligence?
500

Explain the case Bruesewitz v Wyeth 

and

How was the plaintiff awarded

Vaccine case led to a baby having hundreds of strokes in the span of a month

Court decided that plaintiff would be awarded damages from a govt tax (compensation program created to protect companies who manufacture vaccines)

M
e
n
u