Limitations of DNA Statutes 1
CA DNA Testing
T or F
100

Defense has...

Burden of proof

100

When did the Post-conviction DNA testing law go into effect?

January 1, 2001 in CA

100

the three ways for wrongfully convicted to get out of prison are Post-Conviction DNA Testing, Habeas Corpus, and Clemency - T or F

True

200

Burden of proof?

Defense must not only prove testing may exculpate the petitioner, but also that testing may implicate another individual 

200

Penal code section 1417.9

Ensures that law enforcement keep for a longer time all known biological material with apparent potential significance on an issue of identity 

200

Habeas Corpus is completely up to the judge for wrongfully convicted when the petition is brought to court - T or F 

False - Allows petitioners to present evidence not presented at initial trial 

300
Limitations?

Some states do not permit access to DNA when the defendant originally pled guilty 


300

CA Penal Code 1405

The cost of DNA testing ordered under this section shall be borne by the state or the applicant, as the court may order in the interests of justice, if it is shown that the applicant is not indigent and possesses the ability to pay. However, the cost of any additional testing to be conducted by the district attorney or Attorney General shall not be borne by the convicted person


300

The 9-step process  - Step 4 is State Supreme Court - T or F 

False - Step 4 is State post-conviction trial court, Step 5 is State supreme court 

400

Length of DNA process

Many states fail to require full, fair, and prompt proceedings once a DNA testing petition has been filed allowing the potentially innocent to stay

400

Who signed the New CA innocence law?

Governor Brown

400

Cases of innocence are rarely heard - T or F 

True 

500

Finality of denies DNA petitions 

Several laws do not allow individuals to appeal denies petitions for testing 

500

What is the CA innocence LAW - SB 1134

Wrongfully, convicted individuals must prove that had the new evidence been available at the original trial, they more likely than not would have been acquitted of the crime 

500

The innocence protection act of 2004 provides cpmvhiocted individuals access to post conviction DNA testing - T or F

True 

M
e
n
u