Kurut
Kuurdak
Manty
Lagman
Shashlik
100

If we ______ biodiversity, many species would survive.
a) protect
b) protected
c) will protect

b) protected

100

If governments ignored activists, environmental problems ______ worse.
a) become
b) became
c) would become

c) would become

100

If oil exploration stopped completely, pollution ______.
a) would decrease
b) decreased
c) will decrease

a) would decrease

100

If oil exploration had stopped earlier, the ecosystem ______.
a) would recover
b) would have recovered
c) recovered

b) would have recovered

100

If carbon dioxide emissions ______ (fall), the climate ______ (improve).

fell / would improve

200

If companies ______ (stop) oil exploration, the environment ______ (become) cleaner.

stopped / would become

200

If governments had acted responsibly, environmental damage ______ smaller.
a) would have been
b) would be
c) was

a) would have been

200

If governments ______ (protect) natural lands, biodiversity ______ (increase).

protected / would increase

200

If people ______ (care) more about the planet, deforestation ______ (decrease).

cared / would decrease

200

If leaders ______ (listen) to scientists, pollution ______ (decrease).

had listened / would have decreased

300

Use the correct form of the verbs in brackets.

If governments ______ (protect) natural lands earlier, biodiversity ______ (not disappear).

had protected / wouldn’t have disappeared

300

Use the correct form of the verbs in brackets.

If companies ______ (reduce) carbon dioxide emissions, the climate ______ (improve).

had reduced / would have improved

300

Use the correct form of the verbs in brackets.

If people ______ (stop) deforestation, many animals ______ (survive).

had stopped / would have survived

300

If activists ______ (not take) legal action, the land ______ (be destroyed).

hadn’t taken / would have been destroyed

300

If people had protected biodiversity, many species ______ extinct.
a) wouldn’t become
b) wouldn’t have become
c) didn’t become

b) wouldn’t have become

400

Rewrite the sentences using the second conditional.

People cut down too many trees, so animals lose their habitats.

If people didn’t cut down so many trees, animals wouldn’t lose their habitats.

400

Rewrite the sentences using the second conditional.

Activists don’t speak out, so problems remain unsolved.

If activists spoke out, problems wouldn’t remain unsolved.

400

Rewrite the sentences using the second conditional.

Leaders ignore climate change, so carbon dioxide emissions increase.

If leaders didn’t ignore climate change, carbon dioxide emissions wouldn’t increase.

400

Rewrite the sentences using the second conditional.

People waste natural resources, so the planet suffers.

If people didn’t waste natural resources, the planet wouldn’t suffer.

400

Rewrite the sentences using the second conditional.

Governments don’t support environmental laws, so nature is damaged.

If governments supported environmental laws, nature wouldn’t be damaged.

500

Rewrite the sentences using the third conditional!

The company polluted the river, so the water became unsafe.

If the company hadn’t polluted the river, the water wouldn’t have become unsafe.

500

Rewrite using the second conditional!

Governments don’t protect natural lands, so animals lose their habitats.

If governments protected natural lands, animals wouldn’t lose their habitats.

500

Rewrite using the second conditional.

People produce too much carbon dioxide, so the air is polluted.

If people produced less carbon dioxide, the air wouldn’t be polluted.

500

Rewrite using the third conditional!

Governments didn’t protect the forest, so animals lost their habitats.

If governments had protected the forest, animals wouldn’t have lost their habitats.

500

Rewrite using the third conditional!

Companies produced too much pollution, so the river became contaminated.

If companies hadn’t produced so much pollution, the river wouldn’t have become contaminated.

M
e
n
u