Health Literacy Basics
Readability and Material Evaluation
Patient Assessment and Tailoring
Evaluation Models
Putting it all Together
100

The ability to assess, understand, evaluate and communicate information to make health decisions.

Health Literacy.

100

Tool that measures reading ease and reading grade level.

Flesch-Kincaid readability tool.

100

PEEK stands for physical, emotional, experiential and ____ readiness.

Knowledge.

100

The first step in planning an evaluation.

Determine the focus of the evaluation.

100

A patient can explain insulin use but cannot perform it. What evaluation type applies?

Content evaluation (psychomotor).

200

Give one non-verbal behavior that may indicate low health literacy.

Avoiding reading, handing papers back, saying "I'll read it later", blank forms, looking confused, nervous laughter, missing appointments.

200

PEMAT evaluates what two qualities?

Understandability and actionability.

200

Asking "show me how you'd take this medication at home" evaluates which learning domain?

Psychomotor (and content evaluation).

200

Evaluation that happens during teaching to make real-time adjustments.

Process (formative).

200

Most effective method to confirm patient understanding.

Teach-back method.

300

The literacy type needed for calculating medication doses.

Quantitative literacy (numeracy).

300

Target Flesch-Kincaid reading ease score for patient education.

>60 (grade 8-9 reading level).

300

Give an example of tailoring health education.

Adjusting teaching to a patient's language, using pictures for low-literacy learners, aligning meds to daily routine, providing culturally relevant food examples, adjusting timing due to fatigue.

300

Evaluation that measures long-term retention and application of knowledge.

Outcome (summative).

300

Using simple language, chunking, conversational tone. What is this?

Plain language.

400

The approach that assumes all patients may have difficulty understanding information.

Universal precautions approach.

400

SAM evaluates materials based on 6 criteria; name 3.

Content, literacy demand, graphics, layout/typography, learning stimulation and motivation, cultural appropriateness.

400

One-question screening tool for reading difficulty.

SILS - single item literacy screen: "how often do you need help reading instructions or pamphlets?"

400

Evaluation that determines whether a program was worth the cost and resources.

Impact.

400

ER visits drop after a new education program. What evaluation does this show?

Outcome (or impact if comparing cost-benefit/system effects).

500

Give two reasons someone with low literacy may not ask for help.

Shame, stigma, fear of judgement, embarrassed, desire to appear competent, past negative experiences.

500

Why can't readability tools determine comprehension?

Because they only measure word and sentence length, not meaning, visuals, cultural context, prior knowledge, or whether instructions are actionable or understood.

500

Why can even educated patients have low health literacy during hospitalization?

Stress, pain, fear, unfamiliar environment, medications, fatigue - impaired memory, focus, and processing.

500

Give one example of external evidence and one of internal evidence.

External (published research, systematic reviews, census data).

Internal (unit infection rates, program-specific evaluations, quality improvement audits). 

500

How does low health literacy lead to worse outcomes? Give two mechanisms.

Incorrect med use, inability to follow instructions, poor disease management, delayed care, misunderstanding symptoms, decreased adherence, increased complications.

M
e
n
u