Market Equilibrium Basics
Consumer and Producer Surplus
Efficiency and Deadweight Loss
Elasticity and Market Impacts
Government Intervention and Policy
100

What is the point where quantity demanded equals quantity supplied called?

Market equilibrium

100

What does consumer surplus measure?

The difference between what consumers are willing to pay and what they actually pay.

100

What is allocative efficiency?

When total welfare (CS + PS) is maximised and no deadweight loss exists.

100

What does price elasticity of supply measure?

How responsive quantity supplied is to a change in price.

100

What effect does a subsidy have on supply?

It increases supply, shifting the supply curve rightward.

200

When there’s a shortage, what happens to price in a competitive market?

Price rises until equilibrium is restored (where QD = QS).

200

What happens to consumer surplus when price increases?

It decreases because consumers pay more and buy fewer units.

200

What happens to allocative efficiency when a deadweight loss exists?

Allocative efficiency is lost, as total welfare is not maximised.

200

How does an inelastic supply curve affect producers’ ability to respond to price changes?

They can’t change output easily, so supply responds very little to price changes.

200

Why might a government remove a subsidy?

To reduce costs and improve efficiency if the subsidy causes market distortion.

300

What happens to equilibrium price and quantity when supply decreases?

Price increases, quantity decreases.

300

How does producer surplus change when the price of a good rises?

Producer surplus increases, as producers receive a higher price per unit.

300

On a graph, what area represents deadweight loss after a quota or tax?

The triangular area between the demand and supply curves beyond the new equilibrium.

300

Why producer surplus increases more when supply is elastic than when it is inelastic?

In elastic supply, a small price rise leads to a large increase in output, increasing total surplus more.

300

How removing a subsidy affects government spending.

The government saves money that can be redirected to health, education, or welfare.

400

Explain why both consumer and producer surpluses are maximised at equilibrium.

Because resources are allocated efficiently, and no deadweight loss exists.

400

Explain why a decrease in price increases consumer surplus but decreases producer surplus.

A lower price benefits consumers (more affordable) but reduces producers’ earnings, lowering their surplus.

400

Explain why consumer and producer surplus are not maximised when a market is not in equilibrium.

Some CS and PS are lost and not gained by anyone, creating lost welfare (DWL).

400

Use the fishing industry example to describe momentary, short-term, and long-term supply elasticity.

Momentary: fixed boats → vertical supply. Short-term: some inputs fixed → slightly elastic. Long-term: all inputs variable → elastic supply.

400

Describe how a minimum price can benefit producers in an export market.

It raises domestic prices, increasing producer surplus, and producers can export the surplus abroad.

500

Use an economic model explain how removing a subsidy restores allocative efficiency.

Removing the subsidy shifts supply left, removing the deadweight loss, and restoring maximum total surplus.

500

Identify the effect on consumer surplus and producer surplus after a subsidy is removed.

Consumer surplus and producer surplus both decrease, but government costs fall. 

500

Explain how removing a government subsidy can restore allocative efficiency and what effect it has on government

Removing the subsidy eliminates the deadweight loss, CS and PS are maximised , and government costs are saved.

500

How elastic and inelastic price elasticities of supply affect efficiency after a quota is introduced.

Elastic supply creates a larger change in producer surplus but bigger DWL, while inelastic supply causes smaller efficiency losses.

500

How does government intervention, such as subsidies or quotas, impacts allocative efficiency and welfare.

It can distort prices, create deadweight loss, and reduce total welfare, unless carefully targeted to correct market failure.

M
e
n
u