Rizz
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, I'm sure there's an acronym for this...
PRISMA
Going for the scientific 3-peat: This 1990's Scotsman was a doctor, had risk of bias, and database named after him
Dr. Cochrane
Unlike systematic reviews that qualitatively synthesize studies, meta-analyses synthesize studies this way
Quantitively
Practitioners, students, and educators all fall under the same category in the context of a scoping review
Stakeholders
Like a certain intern from 'The Office', this software can help you organize and manage your search results at no additional cost
Rayyan
The fixed-effects model assumes all studies are measuring the true effect, but don't account for variability. Luckily, we have a BETTER model for combining and analyzing study results called...
Random-Effects Model
While you would normally be mindful of this in the London metro, you'd be looking for this in a scoping review
Gap (or Research Gap)
Comparison
As the saying goes: the more, the merrier! In addition to a small variance and RCTs, this leads to a higher weight percentage in meta-analysis statistical testing
Larger sample size