About
The Case
What state did the case come from?
What is Tennessee?
What state is Baker from?
What is Tennessee?
What is Carr’s issue?
What is federal courts do not have the constitutional authority to review districts?
Who won the case?
Who is Baker?
What does Nancy Pelosi do on her spare time?
What is stare at the ceiling in a dark room drinking lukewarm coffee while fascinating about a world where her face is plastered all across the United Brotherhood of Socialism with dreary propaganda posters of how Trump ruined her Caramel Macchiato from Starbucks with facts?
What kept the supreme court from reviewing cases such as these?
What is “political questions”?
What does Baker argue for?
What is the equal and fair representation of votes under the 14th Amendment?
What is Carr’s logic concerning the courts telling other branches how to do their jobs?
What is all branches are made co-equal and cannot interfere with each other’s basic functions?
What was the decision, 6-2, 5-3, 2-6, or
7-1?
What is 6-2?
What is the worst dating app on the planet?
What is the Department of Homeland Security?
What caused the case to be argued?
What is Gerrymandering?
Finish the quote Baker uses to argue that the judicial branch should be able to decide the case. From the text of Article 3, section 2 of the Constitution, “judicial power shall extend to all $$$, in $$$ and $$$, arising under this constitution.” $$$ are missing words...
What are cases, law, and equity?
What does Carr say if the courts pursue the case?
What is the courts will abuse their power and overstep where the constitution stated that states had the right to decide how to draw districts?
What was the decision of the majority?
What is conclude that the federal courts possessed the authority to enforce the equal protection of the law to the states?
What am I going to do on Valentines day?
What is consider how Epstein didn’t kill himself?
What is the issue surrounding the case?
What is, do federal courts have the power to decide cases about the appointment of population in state districts?
What is Baker’s logic concerning whether the courts should review a case under the guise that it is filled with “political questions”?
What is that just because an issue involves politics does not mean it is a political question that a court cannot decide? By refusing to address the problem, courts avoid the issue, which to solve it Baker promotes the idea that they do not have to explicitly say to divide a district but can see if any rights are violated.
What other case was similar to Baker V Carr but followed the logic of Carr and was not decided by the supreme court?
What is Colegrove V Green?
What were the disagreements of the dissents?
What is they asserted that the court’s own options were clear and consistent with refusing to review a states’ districting decision? They saw no basis for interfering with the states as the constitution left it to the state to decide on redistricting.
What is Trumps favorite store?
What is Wallmart?
What years were the case argued, reargued, and decided?
What is argued and reargued in 1961 and decided in 1962?
What is Baker’s main issue?
What is his vote does not count equally?
Was Carr the petitioner or the respondent?
What is the respondent?
Who were the 2 on the dissent that opposed the decision?
Who are Frankfurter and Harlan?
What is the first name of the Spacer’s Choice merchant on Groundbreaker?
Who is Martin?