Adaptive Learning & Assessment
“Built for continuous improvement—Achieve evolves to better support how students learn.”
• Where do you feel your current platform stops evolving with your course?
• If the tool itself kept improving each term, how would that affect your prep workload?
“Goal‑Setting & Reflection Surveys focusing on METACOGNITION.”
• How are you capturing students’ metacognitive reflections today?
• If reflection surveys were auto‑graded, what new insight would you act on first?
“Full‑length $109.99, Brief $94.99—Achieve is a better value.”
• What price–to–feature balance matters most when you choose courseware?
• How do students respond when they see richer tools at a similar or lower cost?
“Diagnostics generate personalized study plans.”
• Where would personalized study plans shorten office‑hour triage for you?
• How do you currently identify misconceptions before the exam?
“Integration of iClicker.”
• What gaps do you see in live polling or real‑time check‑ins right now?
• If polling synced grades automatically, how would that change class participation?
“Macmillan market share 29 % vs Pearson 14 % in Psych.”
• How much does community adoption influence your platform decisions?
• What lessons do you draw when you see a platform doubling its competitor’s share in Psych?
“Adaptive Pathways identify misconceptions in real‑time.”
• Tell me about a time you wished you’d spotted a misconception earlier—what happened?
• How might real‑time remediation shift your lecture pacing?
“Rich multimedia: simulation environments, videos, interactive case studies.”
• Which multimedia elements move the needle most for your Psych majors?
• If simulations lived inside the reading flow, where could you cut external homework?
“Less focus on Psych at Pearson… we can win on service and support.”
• When you need platform help mid‑semester, what response time feels ‘supported’?
• How valuable is discipline‑specific service versus generic tech support for you?