Waterfall vs. Agile
This approach relies on fixed planning and was too rigid for NASA’s mission.
Waterfall
NASA’s mission combined hardware, software, and ______.
Operations
Agile teams work in short cycles called ______.
Iterations (or Sprints)
According to Agile principles, what is more important than processes and tools?
Individuals and interactions
In the NASA case, why was waterfall considered ineffective?
Too rigid for changing conditions
Because all parts of the system depend on each other, this created high ______ between components.
Interdependence
NASA used this method instead of documentation to test ideas early.
Simulation
NASA used a mix of Agile and traditional methods, known as a ______ approach.
Hybrid
What is the main advantage Agile has over waterfall in high-risk environments like space missions?
Flexibility / ability to adapt quickly
This type of system, involving multiple connected parts, is called a ______ system.
Complex (or Mission system)
Why did NASA begin running simulations earlier in the process?
To test processes sooner and reduce risk before the mission
What was the main goal of using Agile methods in the mission system design?
To improve flexibility, efficiency, and reduce risk through continuous testing and adaptation