Line of Reasoning.
What examples showed the protester's line of reasoning?
They feel that animal testing is wrong and that the "Apes (Monkey's) should be set free" they argue that it is inhumane to test on animals.
What was the exigence behind this video?
The exigence was to inform the watchers of both sides of the argument against and for animal testing.
What is one claim of the video from the scientist perspective?
A claim would be that animal testing is necessary to be preformed but it would be good to get away from in the long run.
What examples showed the scientist line of reasoning?
They argue that the monkey's live in good conditions and that they are trying to get rid of animal testing as a whole.
How was pathos used to influence the audience's position on animal testing?
Pathos was used to create a feeling of sympathy in the hearts of many watching and to show the protestor's perspective on animal testing.
What is one claim of the video from the protesters perspective?
The claim would be that animal testing is inhumane and that it shouldn't be continued.
Between the protesters and scientist which line of reasoning was more effective based on facts? Give examples?
The scientist line of reasoning was more affective because they more facts and reasoning to support their claims.
Did the video use more ethos, logos or, pathos to show each side of the argument?
Compare and contrast how both claims are similar and different?
Both claims are similar in the aspect of understanding the negatives of animal testing but differ in whether or not it should be continued.