Reasoning
Did the video creator's have a set opinion or did their reasoning have no bias?
The video had no bias, as they used reasoning both for animal testing and against.
Does the maker of the video use transitional elements?
Yes, statements from citizens and scientists are used as transitional elements throughout the video that help to better organize it.
What tone is the speaker expressing?
Somber, serious, trying to make the audience feel something.
What is the speaker's claim?
The speaker's claim is that animal testing is viewed as cruel to some, but also is a necessary evil in order to progress human life.
How does the video guide understanding through the organization of evidence?
Evidence of the harsh treatment of primates that are used for animal testing are shown throughout the video. This organization of evidence shown guides the audience to understand the line of reasoning.
How does the rhetorical situation influence stylistic choices?
Because the animals are being taken out of their normal environment and it is a serious matter, the speaker chooses to use a serious tone throughout the piece.
Describe the line of reasoning for BOTH sides of the video that is being debated.
For animal testing: It is necessary for the progression of medicine and preserves human lives.
Against animal testing: It is cruel to the animal, as they have done nothing to deserve it and have rights as an organism.
How does the maker of the video organize their ideas and reflect the line of reasoning?
Throughout the video, clips are organized and shown that reflect the video makers line of reasoning by showing clips from scientists, citizens, and the test center.
Explain how the maker of the video uses word choice, syntax and word comparison to relay his point.
The maker of the video is very neutral throughout the piece, therefore it makes sense that the speaker's word choice is very matter-of-fact, the syntax is strictly facts only, and the word comparisons are very minimal.