What Beatitude Is
The Essence and Types of Law
The Eternal Law
The Natural Law
The Euthyphro Dilemma (related to natural law) and Human Law
100

“Happiness is an operation in accord with perfect virtue” is this Aristotelian concept.

Function argument/happiness is rational activity in accordance with virtue

100

This is the law created by people.

Human

100

This is eternal law.

God’s plan for all creation

100

This is how we know the natural law.

Known “per se” or by reason. Natural law is known both in its own right (because it is definitionally true) and as regards to us (because everyone knows what the terms mean)

100

This is the Euthyphro (youth-i-thro) dilemma in relation to Aquinas.

Are things (a) forbidden because they are wrong, or (b) wrong because they are forbidden? If (a), then God’s involvement in morality is minimal, and if (b), then morality is arbitrary

200

This form of beatitude is attainable in this life.

Imperfect beatitude

200

This is the law that is God’s plan for all creation.

Eternal

200

T/F: Sciences are part of the eternal law.

True, they describe part of the natural/God-written order of things

200

This is the first precept of the natural law.

Good ought to be done, evil ought ot be avoided

200

This is how Aquinas would address the challenge that the Euthyphro Dilemma poses.

(a) God’s involvement is not minimal because he created our nature and (b) commands against our nature are harmful, and in order to make a contradictory command that doesn’t go against our nature, God would have to change our nature, which would make us not human

300

This form of beatitude consists in seeing God’s essence.

Perfect beatitude

300

This is the eternal law applied to humans.

Natural

300

This is why a “plan” for creation can be considered a law.

Because all things have to follow this plan/orders

300

This is how the second precepts of natural law are related to “natural inclinations” or human nature.

The second precepts are derived from them

300

This is human law.

Laws passed by human legislators/authorities

400

Aristotle says eudaimonia is found in the speculative sciences/wisdom. This is why Aquinas disagrees.

Because that is imperfect beatitude, and perfect beatitude/eudaimonia is unattainable in this life and found only in seeing God’s essence.

400

To be a real law, a law must be bound by this.

Reason

400

This is why the eternal law can be known.

We can learn about the world through the sciences and gain knowledge of how God ordered things.

400

This is one of the inclinations of the second precept, and a good and evil associated with it.

Preservation of life, reproduction and rearing offspring, knowing the truth (about God), living in society, virtues

400

This is how human law is related to natural law.

Human law is only valid if it stems from natural law as conclusions or specifications

500

Aquinas justifies the distinction between perfect and imperfect beatitude through two Aristotelian arguments. This is one of them.

Perfect beatitude is final AND perfect beatitude is self-sufficient/lacking in nothing

500

To be a real law, a law must be ordered toward this

The common good

500

This is why the eternal law cannot be known in full in this life.

It cannot be known in full because human knowledge is incomplete and learning takes time.

500

This is how the natural law is related to happiness.

It is meant to “perfect our natures” and bring about a good life

500

This is how human law is related to virtue.

Human law can help habituate evil-doers to virtue through fear of punishment

M
e
n
u