Methods
Study Design
Mystery
Goals
Findings
100

How were participants recruited?

Social media

100

What kind of single case study was it?

Delayed-Multiple Baseline Design

100

How many participants were men?

2

100

What was the study investigating?

Efficacy of RNT-focused 3 session ACT for patients with comorbid GAD and depression

100

When were the most changes observed?

At post treatment

200

How many sessions did participants have of ACT?

3

200

How many participants were there in the final study?

6

200

Who was the control group?

The 6 participants

200

What was the independent variable?

The staggered application of 3-session RNT-focused ACT protocol

200

Did changes in the outcome and process methods occur at different periods?

no

300

How frequently were procedures implemented? 

weekly 

300

What was the criteria for participants?

over 18 + GAD and Depression + showed severe symptoms of at least one of them according to the depression anxiety and stress scale

300

free points yay!

:3

300

What was the outcome dependent variable? 

Scores on emotional symptoms and pathological worry

300

Did participants continue to improve in the follow up?

yes

400

What are some specific examples of the measures used in this study?

Acceptance and action questionnaire/Cognitive thinking questionnaire/Perseverative thinking questionnaire/Valuing questionnaire/Depression anxiety and stress scale

400

What were the strengths of this study?

High internal validity in measures and in self-control group, the levels of constructs covered by measures, the strict participant criteria and the multiple points of assessment including a 3 month follow up

400

When was the follow up conducted?

after 3 months/12 weeks after

400

What were the process dependent variables?

Experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion, values living and preservative thinking

400

Why should this study's findings be taken with caution in terms of the effect size?

Because SCED effect sizes are usually higher than those found in group designs such as randomized control trials

500

What were the dependent variables measured through?

Through automatic emails on the internet

500

What were the weaknesses of this study?

Measures were self-reported, confounding variables of other comorbidities, delayed baseline caused less control than concurrent multiple baselines, SCEDs cause lack of active control conditions and lack of mediator analysis

500

How many participants were rejected?

63

500

What was the population of interest in this study?

Adults with comorbid GAD and depression

500

Should RNT-focused ACT be adopted into mental health services according to this article?

Yes

M
e
n
u