Case Facts
Property Law
Legal Issues
Court Decisions
Additional Issues
100

Which province did this case take place in?

Alberta

100

What type of property ownership allows surviving owners to automatically inherit property

Joint tenancy

100

The estate argued that the house should belong to this instead of the surviving spouse

The estate

100

The court ruled the house passed to Veronique through this legal principle

Right of survivorship

100

Which government office would administer the estate if no will is found

Public trustee

200

Where did the couple buy their matrimonial home? 

Edson

200

What doctrine allows a surviving joint owner to obtain full ownership when the other dies

Right of survivorship 

200

This is the central question was whether the joint tenancy had been...

Severed

200

The judge found there was no evidence of this happening to the joint tenancy

Severance 

200

The public trustee mistakenly did this with the household goods from the home

Selling them at auction

300

This major life event happened in April 1991 before Terry Dunn's death

Divorce

300

What form of ownership does NOT transfer property upon death

Tenancy in common

300

The estate administrator had this legal responsibility to prove severance

The burden of proof

300

Because of survivorship, the house did not become part of this

The estate

300

How much did the court award for the lost household goods

$16,500

400

What happened in 1992 that caused the property dispute?

Terry Dunn's death

400

Which legal act could Terry have used to break the joint tenancy before he died

Severing the joint tenancy

400

This Alberta law governed the division of assets between spouses

Matrimonial Property Act

400

The court said benefits received after death must still be considered under this legislation

Matrimonial Property Act

400

The court determined these 2 financial claims should offset each other

Occupation rent and mortgage payments

500

How much were the monthly mortgage payments?

$764/month

500

According to the court, this event alone does NOT automatically sever joint tenancy

Divorce

500

The estate argued that because this legal action had begun, the house should still be divided 

Matrimonial property claim 

500

The judge ruled the estate failed to prove this had occurred before death

Severance of the joint tenancy 

500

The court awarded this type of financial addition because Ms. Dunn waited years for resolution

Prejudgement interest

M
e
n
u