Crime 1
Crime 2
Crime 3
Crime 4
Crime 5
100

Define Common Law Burglary

Bonus: Modern MPC law burglary

Common Law Burglary is the breaking and entering into the dwelling of another at night with the intent to commit a felony or larceny therein. (breaking out once you get locked in does not apply)

MPC burglary: breaking and entering into the property of another with the intent to commit a felony or larceny therein.

100

List the MPC Mental States (mens rea)

Purposefully,

Knowingly

Recklessly

Negligently

100

What is kidnapping?

Unlawful confinement or restraint that involves moving or hiding the victim.

100

What is forgery?

Making a false legal document or altering an existing legal document with the intent to defraud.

*writing must have legal significance.

100

What is uttering?

Offering as genuine, a false instrument with the intent to defraud.

200

What is larceny, and what is larceny by trick?

Larceny is the trespassory taking and carrying away of personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive them thereof.

Larceny by trick is when the defendant intentionally makes a false representation of material past or existing fact to obtain custody of personal property of another.

200

What is the difference between a regular defense and an affirmative defense?

Regular: defeats an element of the crime, raised by the defendant, and defeated by prosecution beyond a reasonable doubt.

Affirmative: provides defendant with an excuse to avoid liability, must be raised and proved by defendant by a preponderance of the evidence.

200

What is common law arson? What is MPC arson?

Common Law Arson is - the malicious burning of the dwelling of another

MPC Arson - Can be a building that is not a dwelling, and can also be a person’s own building. 

200

Explain the Common Law Conspiracy

An agreement between two or more people to commit a crime with the specific intent to commit the crime.

200

What are the two elements of entrapment?

1) the criminal design originated with the police and 

2) defendant was not predisposed to commit the crime.

300

Define Embezzlement.

The fraudulent conversion or misappropriation of property of another by one who is already in lawful possession of that property.

300

Define accomplice liability.

The imposition of criminal liability on a person who did not directly cause the victim's injury but who aided or encouraged the principal in the commission of the crime, with the specific intent that the principal commit the crime.
300

Explain the MPC theory of conspiracy

Unilateral theory of conspiracy is when only one person must have the specific intent to commit the crime and requires an overt act to be performed by a party to the conspiracy

300
People who are NOT accomplices

just being present at the scene

just knowing the principal plans to commit the crime (includes selling ordinary goods at ordinary prices)

member of the class of persons whom the statute is designed to protect

300

What is the irresistible impulse test?

Mental illness prevented defendant from: 

  • controlling actions or
  • conforming conduct to law
400

False Pretenses is the...

intentionally making a false representation of material past or existing fact to obtain TITLE of personal property of another.

400

What is the ALI Model Penal Code Insanity Test?

Mental illness prevented defendant from: 

  • appreciating criminality of conduct or
  • conforming conduct to law
400

Explain the Merger Doctrine.

If defendant is convicted of a crime (the greater offense), he may not be charged with another crime which includes every element of the greater offense (this is called the lesser offense) stemming from the same conduct. i.e. burglary and larceny do not merge.

400

Receipt of Stolen Property or Possession of Stolen Property elements

Receiving possession of personal property which the defendant knows was obtained in a criminal manner with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of it. 

400
What are the elements to the McNaughten Insanity test?

Mental illness prevented defendant from: 

  • understanding nature or quality of the criminal act or
  • knowing that his/her actions were wrong
500

Name the Specific Intent Crimes, the mens rea required and any defenses available.

Assault, Larceny, Larceny by Trick, False Pretenses, Embezzlement, Robbery, Burglary, First degree murder, conspiracy, attempt and solicitation, receipt of stolen property, forgery, uttering.

Mens Rea: D intentionally or knowingly commits the crime.

Defenses: mistake of fact (reasonable or unreasonable), involuntary intoxication, voluntary intoxication

500

Name the Malice Crimes, the mens rea required and the defenses available.

Arson, 2nd degree murder (intent to cause serious bodily harm)

Mens Rea: defendant consciously disregarded an obvious risk.

Defenses: reasonable mistake of fact, involuntary intoxication

500

Name the General Intent Crimes, the mes rea required, and any defenses available.

Battery, Rpe, Kidnapping, False Imprisonment

Mens Rea: conscious desire to do the act.

Defenses: Reasonable mistake of fact, involuntary intoxication

500

Name the Strict Liability Crimes, their mens rea and any defenses available.

Statutory Rpe, statutory public safety offenses (speeding), statutory public morals offenses (corrupting minor)

No mens rea; engaging in act is sufficient.

No defenses (but involuntary intoxication is treated as an affirmative defense in these case)

500

Name the affirmative defenses to crimes

Insanity, Defense of Others, Self-Defense, Defense of Property, Imperfect Self Defense, Duress (except intentional killing), Necessity, Entrapment, Statute of Limitations

M
e
n
u