this means "the process of giving a systematic account of reasons in support of a claim or belief."
argument
It looks like this:
P1: If A, then B
P2: B
C: Therefore, A
affirming the consequent
good arguments connect the premises to this
the conclusion
this type of argument is an appeal to popularity in an effort to show the claim is true, i.e. since so many people believe the claim, the claim must be true
Ad Populum (Latin for "to the people") fallacy
if an argument is valid it does not mean this
it is true
essential features of a basic argument include these two elements
premises and a conclusion
this type of argument states that because an expert thinks the claim is true, the claim must be true
inappropriate appeal to authority fallacy
If an argument is this it means that the premises are relevant to the conclusion
valid
this type of argument attempts to prove false (or true) an idea based on the original source of that idea
genetic fallacy
this is the word used to describe a mistake in reason
fallacy
P2: Mr. Hadley is a man
C: Therefore,...
Mr. Hadley is mortal
this type of argument suggests that a question has only two possible answers and that a choice must be made between those two only
false dilemma fallacy
this kind of argument is defined as premises which support a conclusion
deductive
this type of argument looks like this:
P1: If A, then B
P2: Not A
C: Therefore, not B
denying the antecedent
we always ask this question when examining a deductive argument
are the premises true?
this type of argument gathers evidence which makes the conclusion probable
inductive
this type of argument is directed at a person, instead of at a line of reasoning, in an effort to show the opponent's position is incorrect
Ad Hominem (Latin for "to the man") fallacy
this type of syllogism "affirms a condition that guarantees a conclusion"
Modus Ponens
this type of argument is an intentional distraction away from relevant issues
red herring fallacy
this type of syllogism "denys the content in the conclusion by denying a condition that is necessary to guarantee the conclusion."
Modus Tollens
this law of logic says that "whatever something is, that is what it is"
for any object (A) that object is what it is (A) and not something else
"things are what they are"
Law of Identity
this type of argument is circular in nature and occurs when the truth of one or more premises depends on the truth of the conclusion
begging the question fallacy
this law of logic deals with the properties of an object
for any proposition P, P and not-P cannot both be true at the same time and in the same sense
Law of non-contradiction
this type of argument has been intentionally weakened, distorted, or is an obviously false version of your opponent's argument
straw man fallacy
this law of logic deals with clear, unambiguous statements
unambiguous means not open to more than one interpretation
asserts that either P or not-P must be true
Law of excluded middle