Mindset Shift
ENGAGEMENT vs INVESTIGATION
REGULATIONS
INVESTIGATOR DECISIONS
INVESTIGATOR RED FLAGS
100

A Customer Engagement Agent can transfer a suspicious call, but a Fraud Investigator must do this instead.

Own the investigation / make the final decision

100

Who completes the Fraud Intake Form first?

Fraud Engagement Agent

100

This regulation protects customers from be responsible for unauthorized charges.

Regulation Z

100

You see in the notes that the Fraud Engagement Agent noted the customer sounded nervous. Is that alone enough to deny fraud?

No

100

An Intake Agent noted the customer gave inconsistent information during the initial fraud claim call. As an Investigator, why might this be important?

It may indicate suspicious activity, possible account takeover, or inconsistencies that require further review.

200

True or False:
A Fraud Investigator should assume the customer is telling the truth if they sound believable.

False

200

Who determines whether the fraud claim is approved or denied?

Fraud Investigator

200

This regulation focuses on suspicious activity and money laundering awareness.

BSA / AML

200

An investigator notices account notes do not match the customer’s story. What should happen next?

Further investigation / verify facts / review history

200

An account has 5 fraud claims submitted within 2 months. What should this pattern make an investigator consider?

Possible fraud abuse, repeated suspicious activity, or need for deeper investigation.

300

Complete the phrase:
“A good investigator doesn’t assume, they ______.”

Confirm

300

Customer says: “That’s not my account.”
Which team investigates whether the application/use was fraudulent?

Fraud Investigators

300

This regulation ensures communications are clear and not misleading.

UDAAP

300

The memos say the Customer passed verification, but the transaction behavior looks suspicious.


What should investigators rely on?

Facts, account history, transaction patterns, investigation

300

An account suddenly has multiple large payments made in a short period of time that do not match normal account behavior. Why might this stand out?

Unusual account behavior / possible suspicious activity / potential fraud indicator.

400

What is more important for investigators:
Emotion or facts?

Facts (while still using judgment/gut instinct)

400

Customer disputes a suspicious transaction.
Engagement applies intake and provisional credit.
What do you think the Investigator does next?

Review account history, transaction details, authorization, notes, and determine validity

400

This regulation helps ensure fraudulent accounts are corrected with credit bureaus.

FCRA

400

What should an investigator do BEFORE making a final fraud decision?

Review all available information/evidence

400

A customer claims a transaction is fraudulent, but account history shows similar spending patterns with the same merchant type. What should investigators do?

Review deeper before deciding; compare spending history, notes, transaction patterns, and supporting evidence.

500

Why can approving invalid fraud claims be dangerous?

Financial loss / fraud abuse / risk to the company / encouraging fraud behavior

500

What is the biggest mindset difference between Engagement and Investigation?

Engagement focuses on support/service.
Investigation focuses on analysis, protection, and decision-making.

500

This regulation may stop collection activity while fraud is investigated.

FDCPA

500

Why is critical thinking important in fraud investigations?

Because investigators make decisions that impact both the customer and the company

500

An investigator notices:

  • Multiple fraud disputes
  • Different phone numbers recently added
  • Address changes
  • Unusual payment activity

What does this combination suggest?

Potential account takeover, organized fraud activity, or elevated fraud risk requiring deeper investigation.

M
e
n
u