Objective
Literature
Quality
Results
100

What is the population?

Who are adults in high income countries

100
What type of studies did they look for?

What are Randomized Control Trials?

100

How was bias reviewed?

What is duplicate assessment and third author to settle disagreements?

100

What is the issue with the funnel plot depicting energy data?

What is less than ten study minimum requirement?

200

What is the intervention?

What is regular breakfast consumption?
200

What 3 databases were searched?

What are PubMed, Ovid Medline and CINAHL?

200

What tool was utilized to assess bias?

What is Cochrane's tool for assessing bias?

200

What is the appropriate method to use to analyze combined data when it is heterogeneous?

What is random effects meta-analysis?

300

What is the control?

What is no regular breakfast consumption?
300

What statistic was not mentioned when describing the study selection process?

What is a Kappa statistic?

300

What was the overall conclusion about the scientific quality of the studies included?

What is low quality due to high bias risk?

300

How precise were the energy results?

What is not very precise, wide CI; 78/2000=4; 440/2000=22%, therefore between 4-22% of daily calories

400

What is the outcome?

What is weight change and energy intake?

400

What potential issue could arise from limiting search to studies in English?

What is Publication Bias?

400

When evaluating the forest plot for body weight, are results congruent?

Yes, because confidence intervals mostly overlap.

400

Why were both results considered significant?

What is both resulted in a value with a CI that did not cross the line of significance (0 for continuous data)?

500

The review protocol being registered with PROSPERO in Feb 2017 indicates what type of design?

What is a priori design?

500

What was a strength of the search process?

What is reviewing clinical trials that were registered but unpublished/ongoing?

500

What amount of heterogeneity was identified by the statistical heterogeneity test (I2) for body weight?

What is moderate heterogeneity, 43%?

500

Is either result clinically significant?

Debate it.

M
e
n
u