Words
Avosai
My Father (Father)
In the Case of "Who's Father" there are 2 Tannaim that argue. Which is the Rebbe and which is the Talmid?
Rebbe - Rabba
Talmid - Abaye
In the Case of "Whose Father" why does Abaye disagree with Rabba?
Because it's Migu against Eidim
In the case of Contradictory Eidim, what did the eidim say that was contradicted?
Mr. Chazaka / Mr. Inheritor "has a Chazaka"
What are the names of the earlier Amoraim that argued about contradictory Eidim?
Rav Huna / Rav Chisda
Zavanta (31a Line 5)
Bought it
In the case of "Whose Father" which person changed his claim - Mr. Inheritor or Mr. Chazaka?
What did he change his claim to?
Mr. Chazaka
It belonged to your father but I bought it from him
In the case of "Who's Father" when Mr. Chazaka changes his claim, what is his explanation?
I was so secure as if the property belonged to my father
In the Case of "Contrad. Eidim" what are the names of the 2 Amoraim that argue and what is each opinion?
Rav Nachman / Rava
Rav Nachman - Mr. Inheritor wins
Rava - Nobody wins
What is the difference between the argument of Rav Nachman / Rava and the argument between Rav Huna / Rav Chisda?
Rav Nachman / Rava - Contradicted in the same case
Rav Huna / Rav Chisda - Contradicted in a different case
Avrai (31a Line 18)
Outside
In the case of "Whose Father" what are the names of the 2 Amoraim that argue?
Ula and Nahardai
What are the 2 cases where Ula and Nahardai agree that Mr. Chazaka can change his claim?
1) He claims that "My father bought it from your father"
2) Outside of Beis Din before the court case he claimed something completely different
What is the explanation for Rav Nachman?
Since the testimony of "It belonged to his father" was not contradicted, it's accepted
Which case is more believable - Osah Eidus or Future Testimony
Future Testimony
Mukcheshes (31a Line 27)
Contradicted
In the Sugya of "Change Your Claim" there are 5 cases. In how many of those cases do Ula and Nahardai argue?
Whom do we pasken like?
1
Ula
When Mr. Chazaka changes his claim to "My father bought it from your father" he is believed. What is the reason that he is believed? (Hint - Rashbam)
1) Since his chazaka has a Taina
or
2) Because he has a Migu
What is the explanation for Rava?
Since one set of eidim is definitely lying which makes them Possul and we do not know which set is lying, we do not accept either one
If group 1 contradicted Group 2 and 1 week later a witness from Group 1 joined a witness from Group 2 and testified about something else. Are they believed? Explain:
No, since one of them is certainly Possul
Lizeilusa (31b Line 13)
For the Cheapening
What are the 2 cases where Ula and Nahardai agree that Mr. Chazaka can not change his claim?
1) He originally said "it's my father and not your father"
2) He went outside Beis Din and then came back in and changed his claim (I bought it from your father)
Mr. Chazaka left the Beis Din and returned and changed his claim to "My Father bought from your father". Is he Believed?
Tosefos is unsure
What problem does the Gemara have with the Machlokes between Rav Nachman / Rava?
This argument already took place between earlier Amoraim so they should be quoting the name of the earlier Amora that they agree with
In the case of "Contradictory Eidim" , what twist happened and why would I think that Mr. Inheritor should still win (according to Rav Nachman)?
Twist - Mr. Chazaka brought Eidim that it belonged to his Father
I would think that we don't change our original P'sak so that we don't cheapen Beis Din