Collaboration & Feedback
Writing Process (Zinsser)
Tone & Professionalism
Grammar Traps
Ethics in Practice
200

Give one reason Tebeaux & Dragga say collaborative writing is common in workplaces.

It combines expertise and improves accuracy.

200

Zinsser urges writers to "rewrite and rewrite."

Good writing comes from careful revision and tightening.

200

Give one hallmark of professional tone in technical writing.

Respectful, neutral, and solution-oriented language.

200

Find the subject-verb error: "The group of engineers is meeting." 

“Group” is singular; it should read “is meeting.”

200

What is one ethical risk when summarizing data? 

Distorting results through selective presentation.

400

Name one challenge that teams face when co-authoring documents.

Coordinating schedules or keeping a consistent style.

400

What does Zinsser advise about a writer's “voice"?

Let your natural voice come through

400

Why should emotional language be avoided in workplace documents?

It can appear biased or unprofessional and distract from the facts.

400

Differentiate “its” and “it’s.” 

“Its” is possessive; “it’s” means “it is” or “it has.”

400

Why is citing sources critical in technical documents? 

It gives credit and allows readers to verify information.

600

Why is early peer feedback valuable during drafting?

It identifies problems before major writing, saving time and resources.

600

What trap does Zinsser warn against when trying to sound professional?

Inflated or pompous language that obscures meaning.

600

How can a writer stay professional when delivering bad news?

Be direct yet tactful and emphasize next steps or solutions.

600

Give an example of a misplaced modifier and correct it.

"Running quickly, the finish line was crossed." → "Running quickly, she crossed the finish line."

600

What ethical guideline does Zinsser imply when warning against jargon? 

Writers must respect readers by making meaning accessible.

800

Give one tool or practice that supports smooth team writing.

Shared cloud platform, version control system, or agreed style guide.

800

Why does Zinsser call clutter "the disease of American writing"?

It hides the message and wastes readers' time.

800

Why is consistency in formatting part of professionalism?

It shows attention to detail and builds reader trust.

800

Why can passive voice weaken technical writing? 

It can hide responsibility and make sentences less direct.

800

Give an example of something legal that may still be unethical in professional communication.

Presenting accurate data but in a misleading context, such as manipulating a graph's scale.

1000

How can a team settle disagreements over content?

Establish clear roles, document decisions, and compromise based on audience needs.

1000

What is Zinsser's key to finding one's personal style?

Write honestly and edit ruthlessly until the prose matches your authentic voice.

1000

Why do Tebeaux & Dragga caution against sarcasm or humor in professional writing?

It risks misinterpretation and damages credibility.

1000

When is passive voice acceptable in technical communication?

When the actor is unknown or unimportant, e.g., “The sample was tested.”

1000

Tebeaux and Dragga highlight two core ethical principles: name them. 

Honesty and respect for the reader.

M
e
n
u