Facts of the Case
Facts of the Case
The Decision
Impact
McCutcheon V FEC
100

What law is challenged in the case?

Bipartisan Campaign Finance Act of 2002 (BCRA)

100

During which primary did the events of the case take place?

2008 Democratic primary

100

Which side did the supreme court take?

Citizens United

100

What precedent did the Court Set 

Expanded ways in which corporations can influence elections.

100

Who did the court side with?

McCutcheon

200

What was the name of the film that Citizens United Produced 

"Hillary the Movie"

200

When was the case argued?

 2010

200

What element of the constitution did the judges use in their decision?

First Amendment: Free Speech


200

What question was raised regarding campaign campaign finance?

What role should corporations and rich peole play in influencing elections

200

What precedent was set?

This case broadened the ability of someone to contrinute financially to many different campaigns within a short period of time.

300

Which section of BCRA was challenged?

Section 203, 201 and 311

300

Under which amendment did Citizens United claim their actions were protected by?

First Amendment: free speech

300

What was the result of the decision?

5-4

300

Did the Court's decision impact the 2008 primary?

No, the decision took place 2 years later

300

Which law was challenged?

Bipartisan Campaign Financa Act (BCRA)

400

What does section 203 of BCRA prohibit?

It is illegal for corporations or groups to engage in elections communications 60 or 30 days before an election or primary.

400

What does BCRA stand for?

Bipartisan Campaign Finance Act 

400

What law was declared unconsitutional? 

Section 203 of BCRA

400

What can corporations and groups now do as a result of Citizens United v. FEC

Corporations can spend as much as they want to influence elections 

400

Which constitutional principle did the court base their decision on?

First amendment 

500

What does section 201 of BCRA prohibit?

Communications must be disclosed and a disclaimer must be issued when communications are not directly tied to a candidate.

500

How did a corporation argue that they were protected by civil liberties in the consitution?

Previous supreme court precedent stated that corporations are made up of a group of individuals and thus had rights 

500

What changed as a result of this case?

Corporations and groups can run advertisements at any time during an election.

500

What section of BCRA was declared unconsitutional 

Section 203

500

What part of BCRA was overturned 

2 year agregate contribution limitations 

M
e
n
u