Writing
Arguments
Citing Works
Appeals/Organization
Logical Fallacies
100

A sentence containing one independent clause

Simple Sentence

100

Making broad generalizations and conclusions from specific observations

Inductive Argument

100

Sources held to high standards of accuracy

Academic Sources

100

Emotional appeal 

Pathos

100

Using scare tactics, threats, or dangers

Appeal to Fear

200

Using pronouns like you and your

Second Person

200

Named after British philosopher ; claims, grounds, warrants, backing, rebuttals, and qualifiers

Toulmin Method

200
When a piece of the text is taken directly and placed in the paper with quotation marks. 

Direct Quotation

200

The way items are organized on a picture

Spatial Arrangement

200

Linking the person making an argument to an unpopular person or group

Guilt by Association

300

Changing all the words in a passage and putting them in your own words

Paraphrase

300

Overview, background, confirmation, rebuttal, concession, and summation. Goal is to win. 

classical argument

300

Sources that are vague, and sometimes invalid

Popular Source

300

Using evidence from the past, citing scientific data

Logos

300

Misuse of the argument, presenting only two options when other options exist

False Dilemma

400

Words that lead into a quote

Signal Phrase

400

Named after american psychologist, compromise

Rogerian Argument

400

Giving source information after summaries ; could be direct quotes or paraphrases

Parenthetical Citations

400

Creating a perfect moment to deliver a certain message

Kairos

400

Associating oneself with  ordinary people, to which the audience might identify with

Plain Folk

500

Putting the person before the descriptor

People-first language

500

Starts with overall claim, then provides examples/evidence

Deductive Argument

500

A quotation of more than four typed lines that must be formatted differently from other quotations.

Block Quotation

500

How well a speaker is trusted by the audience

Ethos
500

a logos appeal that confuses correlation with causation

post talk

M
e
n
u