In reviewing the a Contracts Clause challenge when the State or local Government is a party to the contract, the United States Supreme Court has held that these laws or regulations would be subject to the same review as with private contracts.
True or False
False
The term used to refer to the government's power to take private property for public purpose.
Eminent Domain
The landmark decision in which the United States Supreme Court upheld the State Statute limiting the number of hours an employee in a bakery or confectionery establishment.
Lochner v. New York (1905)
What was Justice Elena Kagan's most recent job before she became a United States Supreme Court Justice?
Solicitor General
Where the Contracts Clause is located
Article I
Where in the Constitution is the Takings Clause located?
Fifth Amendment
This case recognized an individual's Second Amendment right to possess a firearm, striking down a District of Columbia law.
District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)
Who wrote the opinion in Marbury v. Madison (1803)?
Chief Justice John Marshall
The United States Supreme Court in Energy Reserves Group, Incorporated v. Kansas Power & Light Company (1983) set forth this 3-part test to determine whether State or local Governments have violated existing private contracts.
(1) Is there substantial impairment of a contractual relationship? (2) Does the law/regulation serve a significant and legitimate public purpose? (3) Is the law/regulation reasonably related to achieve the Government's goal?
In West Coast Hotel Company v. Parrish (1937), one of the litigants, Elsie Parrish, was employed in what capacity.
Chambermaid
This case in which the United States Supreme Court upheld Congress' Filled Milk Act of 1923 contained a footnote has become famous and instrumental in when a more searching judicial scrutiny is necessary.
United States v. Carolene Products Company (1938)
This United States Supreme Court Justice spoke at Charleston School of Law in 2013
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor
From the late 1880's to the 1930's the United States Court was unsympathetic to striking down State laws based on the Contracts Clause. Challengers of State regulations used this Clause instead
Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
According to Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff (1984), a key factor in determining whether the public use requirement has been violated is whether the government program provides for the ownership of property taken from one private individual eventually to be transferred to another private individual.
(A) True (B) False
(B) False
This case that originated in South Carolina held that a taking of this property on the Atlantic Ocean would be the result when the Government's regulation denies all economically beneficial or productive use of land.
Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council (1992)
Of the Justices currently sitting on the United States Supreme Court, which was confirmed by the most narrow margin
Justice Brett Kavanaugh (50 - 48)
This United States Supreme Court case held that the Minnesota Mortgage Moratorium Law did not violate the Contracts Clause.
Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell (1934)
In Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Incorporated (1955), the Court emphasized its holding that laws regulating business and employment practices (economic regulations) would be upheld under the Due Process Clause as long as the laws met this standard
The laws/regulations are rationally related to achieve a legitimate Government purpose.
In Kelo v. City of New London (2005), the City of New London regulated the disposition of property for the purpose of this company to build and draw new business to the area.
Pfizer
This Clause that was rejected as a challenge of certain rights in the Slaughter-House Cases (1872) has become a major tool for challengers alleging a violation of their rights.
The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Of the current United States Supreme Court Justices, this Justice has served the longest term
Justice Clarence Thomas