Why can’t I use the QMS when I’m offline?
Why can’t anyone from my company log in to view a document without a license?
Why is the implementation price so high?
Based on Business needs: CQ is OOB but many factors come into play – Each business is unique
Factors to consider: user permissions, approval matrices, organization hierarchy…
Many project variables: number of sites, modules, go live date, integrations
Our goal is to share a Scope of work that fits what you need so we can scale with you
We’re concerned over the safety risks associated with a cloud platform. Do you offer an on-premises model
MasterControl offers BI dashboards and smart insights. We’re not sure CQ can give us the same level of data-driven insights.
MasterControl legacy platform and disconnected solutions (not data driven)
Limited reporting for MC (only some dashboards/reports with limited configuration)
CQ offers full SF reporting capabilities (customizable dashboards & reports)
CQ offers predictive analytics + AI powered capabilities
We are looking for a platform that lets us manage e-learning and course content (LMS). Why doesn’t your training management solution offer that?
What you are looking for is a full LCMS platform that allows you to not just manage or access training content but also create the content.
CQ Training management allows you to manage both online and instructor led training. Content in SCORM format is easily imported.
CQ training also provides assessments or exams to ensure the trainee has well understood the content. is more fitted for instructor led training for employees
Lastly, CQ Training helps you track compliance ensuring all employees are trained and are compliant with their job function and related SOPs.
Why do I have to pay so much for Lite Users?!
Lite users are only 25% part of full process
Lite users can do more than read docs –
Lite Readers can approve, review…
Price of lite users drops with volume (can go as low as $5)
Why can’t you give me a fixed priced bid when you already did a discovery session
We felt the system is too advanced for our requirements. We’re worried that it will be difficult to use for most of our employees who aren’t quality experts.
Your solution looks like it requires an experienced admin and a lot of coding to configure. Why should I go with you instead of a competitor that's much easier to configure to fit our needs?
BONUS: It's ETQ
Do you offer Management of Change (MOC) and Behavioral Based Safety Solutions (BBS)?
We require a free trial. Can I get a sandbox?
Why are we being asked to pay for proof of concept?
Why do I need to bring EQMS and EHS together when they are separate today in my plants?
No more data silos between quality and safety – Reporting and analytics will be much more comprehensive
Harmonization and unification of interfaces and tools
Paying for one platform instead of two
1 platform instead of 2 also means less integrations, less updates, less IT support…
We already use SAP as a platform and SAP offers the same solutions you’re offering. Why should we go with you?
SAP is mainly an ERP solution not a QMS
SAP offers some Quality capabilities specific to QC and material with no other quality focused features
CQ is dedicated to a complete suite of quality solutions not just limited to production
CQ offers a more comprehensive set of features (both breadth and depth) --> scalable
CQ has AI-powered capabilities and advanced analytics --> more ROI
CQ can be fully integrated with SAP so no loss of data