Any arrest must be based on this:
Probable Cause
In order to object to a governmental search, the plaintiff needs:
standing
This type of warrant exception applies contemporaneously in the time and place of the arrest
Search Incident to a Lawful Arrest
When a reasonable person doesn't feel free to leave, they are in:
Custody
"And I won't say a word until I see my lawyer!" The defendant has invoked this 6A right:
The right to counsel
This exists when a reasonably prudent person would believe that a suspect has committed or is committing a crime.
Probable Cause
To have standing, a person must have this:
Reasonable expectation of privacy
The interrogation must be by this kind of individual for miranda warnings to apply
Publicly paid police
No question about it -- invoking the right to an attorney must be done in this manner
Unambiguously
Terry Stop
The key ingredients to not getting arrested for cooking meth at your friend's apartment: a pillow? Because these type of guests have standing.
Overnight
The legal standard for stop and frisk is:
Miranda warnings apply when
there is a custodial interrogation
The 6A right to an attorney applies during
All critical stages of prosecution after formal proceedings have begun (post-indictment interrogation, preliminary hearings to determine probable cause, arraignment, post-charge line-ups, sentencing, felony trials)
Every occupant
Probable Cause
Particularity
Miranda waivers must be _______ and _______
Knowingly and voluntary
DAILY DOUBLE: A right to trial by jury provides that this is the minimum number of jurors permissible
DUI and Border Crossing checkpoints are constitutional if applied in this way:
Neutral
The sufficiency of an informant's information is subject to determination by this.
For the hot pursuit of a fleeing felon to give rise to a warrant exception, the police must be within this amount of time behind the felon
15 minutes
Double jeopardy attaches in a jury trial at this time.
When the jury is sworn in
(In a bench trial, it's when the first witness is sworn in)
The standard to determine whether a prospective juror should be excluded for cause is whether the juror's views would prevent or substantially impair this:
the performance of her duties