SCOTUS
Florida Supreme Court
1st & 2d DCA
3rd & 4th DCA
5th & 6th DCA
100

This case's chief issue concerned whether a judge or a jury should determine if a defendant’s prior felonies occurred on “separate occasions” under the ACCA

What is Erlinger v. United States?

100

This case involves a defendant's motion to suppress incriminating statements during an interrogation, which was properly denied by the trial court under the Fifth Amendment's Miranda rights

What is Herard v. State?

100

This brief detention, otherwise known as a stop-and-frisk, was conducted with suspicions  deemed not reasonable in Carter v. State

What is a Terry Stop?

100

This case from the 3d DCA involved a declination to decide whether the smell of marijuana was enough for probable cause under Florida's new medical marijuana laws

What is Wright-Johnson v. State?

100

This method of drug detection is no longer enough alone to provide probable cause for a warrantless search as ruled in Ford v. State from the 5th DCA, as it cannot distinguish illegal marijuana use from legal medical use

What is an alert from a K9?

200

This Act's amended 2018 version downgrading the penalty for first-time offenders with firearms was central in the recently released decision for Hewitt v. United States

What is the First Step Act?

200

These two cases taken up by the Florida Supreme Court involve claims regarding the ruling of Erlinger by the Supreme Court the previous year (name one)

What is Wainwright v. State? 

OR 

What is Tanzi v. State?

200

This Act was the center of a complex legal dilemma encountered in Wester v. State in trying to determine whether a single individual planting narcotics and falsely arresting individuals was enough to qualify as an "enterprise"

What is the RICO Act?

200

This case from the 4th DCA involved the unlawful search of the defendant's social media without a warrant, as it was deemed not a good-faith exception of the exclusionary rule

What is Young v. State?

200

This 6th DCA case involved an incorrect instruction about justifiable use of deadly force given to the jury, although the defendant was found to have suffered no prejudice from the instruction

What is Moradi v. State?

300

This case's denial of cert involves dissent from Justice Gorsuch regarding his opinion that Florida's allowance of 6 jurors to make up a jury is unconstitutional according to the Seventh Amendment

What is Cunningham v. Florida?

300

This case affirmed that information about biological parents does not qualify as mitigation evidence as it is not "relevant to the defendant’s character, prior record, or the circumstances of the offense to be admissible.”

What is Randolph v. State?

300

This case involved a defendant claiming he was coerced into going pro se after 14 different Faretta inquiries

What is Ash v. State?

300

This motion not performed by defense counsel in trial court was the driving factor behind the defendant's subsequent motion claiming he had ineffective counsel in Nixon v. State, which was ruled to have been properly denied

What is strike for cause?

300

This 6th DCA case involved the improper dismissal of charges brought against the defendant for bringing a covered machete into Wal-Mart as a convicted felon

What is State v. Ivory (2024)?

400

This exception was found to not require virtually identical and identifiable comparator evidence for retaliatory arrest cases in Gonzalez v. Trevino

What is the Nieves Exception?

400

This three-pronged test was not met by the defendant in Foster v. State, and thus his postconviction motion for a disability claim was properly denied

What is the Atkins test?

400

This case was an opportunity for the 2d DCA to clarify its previous ruling in Owens v. State (2021) while also allowing Chief Justice Sleet to let his dissent stand as an endorsement of the decision of Baxter v. State (2024) from the 5th DCA

What is Simmons v. State?

400

This occurrence was viewed in precedent to be a fundamental error in judicial proceedings, but was not seen as a sufficient reason to garner a rehearing in Salgado-Mantilla v. State as both counsel had priorly agreed to it 

What is the judge leaving the courtroom during the presentation of evidence?

400

This phrase previously required to be put on the driver's license of certain offenders was found to be unconstitutional and a violation of the 1st Amendment in Crist v. State, although the 5th DCA still urges the Florida Supreme Court to hear it as well.

What is "SEXUAL PREDATOR"?

500

This federal law's "otherwise" clause was ruled in Fischer v. United States to limit criminal liability where the Government can prove the defendant impaired the availability or integrity of official documents

What is the Sarbanes-Oxley Act?

500
Which Florida Supreme Court Justice has concurred in several death penalty cases to reiterate their dissent in Lawrence v. State (2020) disagreeing with the removal of proportionality review in death penalty cases?

Who is Justice Jorge Labarga?

500

This reason for incapacitation was seen by the trial court as a waiving of the defendant's right to be at his trial in Nipper v. State, only for the case to be remanded for a new trial by the 1st DCA

What is the ingestion of meth?

500

This response made by the defendant in Smith v. State was affirmed to be a statement, not a question, regarding the law enforcement officer's reading of his constitutional rights, thus requiring that no answer needed to be given by said officer

What is "I can contact my lawyer."?

500

This test was proven to be satisfied in State v. Banda, where the trial court erred in failing to charge the defendant of both solicitation and transmission of harmful material to a minor out of fear of double jeopardy

What is the "different elements test"?

M
e
n
u