Criminal Liability Defenses
Criminal Liability Defenses pt2
Parties to Crime
Participation Before and During the Crime
Inchoate Crimes
100

Justification Defenses

defendants admit they were responsible for their acts but claim that, under the circumstances, what they did was right



100

Insanity

the legal term that refers to a mental disease or defect that impairs the reason and/ or will to control action

100

Accomplices

participants before and during the commission of crimes


100

Accomplice Liability

liability that attaches for participation before and during a crime (prosecution for the crime itself)


100

Criminal Attempts

trying but failing to commit crimes


200

Excuse Defenses

defendants admit what they did was wrong but claim that, under the circumstances, they weren’t responsible for what they did


200

Civil Commitment

courts have to decide if defendants who were insane when they come



200

Accessories

participants after crimes are committed


200

Accessory Liability

liability that attaches for participation after crimes are committed (prosecution for a minor offense other than the crime itself)


200

Criminal Conspiracy

making an agreement to commit a crime


300

Affirmative Defenses

defendants have to “start matters off by putting in some evidence in sup- port” of their justification or excuse defenses


300

Mental Disease

most courts define it as psychosis, mostly paranoia and schizophrenia


300

Principals in the First Degree

persons who actually commit the crime


300

Conspiracy

an agreement to commit some other crime


300

Criminal Solicitation

trying to get someone else to commit a crime


400

Perfect Defenses

Defenses in which defen- dants are acquitted if they’re successful


400

Mental Defect

refers to mental retardation or brain damage severe enough to make it impossible to know what you’re doing, or if you know, you don’t know that it’s wrong


400

Principals in the Second Degree

persons present when the crime is committed and who help commit it [lookouts and getaway drivers]

400

Pinkerton Rule

the crime of conspiracy and the crime the conspirators agree to commit are separate offenses


400

Inchoate Offenses

from the Latin “to begin”; crimes that satisfy the mens rea of purpose or specific intent and the actus reus of taking some steps toward accomplish- ing the criminal pur- pose—but not enough steps to complete the intended crime


500

Imperfect Defenses

when a defendant fails in the full defense but is found guilty of a lesser offense


500

Defense of Duress

when defendants use the excuse that they were forced to do what they did


500

Accessories Before the Fact

 persons who are not present when the crimes are committed but who help before the crime is committed (for example, someone who provided a weapon used in a murder)


500

Mere Presence Rule

a person’s presence at, and flight from, the scene of a crime aren’t enough to satisfy the actus reus requirement of accomplice liability


500

Racketeering

original meaning was the extortion of money or advan- tage by threat or force; now the meaning has expanded to include a pattern of illegal activity (such as extortion and murder) carried out in the furtherance of an enterprise owned or controlled by those engaged in the activity


M
e
n
u