Fundamentals of Crit. Thinking
Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
Fallacies
Information and Ethics
100

2 fundamental components of reasoning

claims and arguments

100

Reasoning through evidential support

Inductive reasoning

100

"Dogs are like cats because both have fur, so they should be fed the same diet."

False equivalence

100

Incorrect information spread without malicious intent

Misinformation

200

Reasoning is grounded in ______, which is always changing and varies in contexts

Language

200

Deductive reasoning requires at least ___ true premises to reach a conclusion

2

200

"I died after I ate pickles. Pickles killed me"

Post hoc ergo propter hoc

200

this ethical framework would likely pull the lever to save five lives, even if it sacrifices one.

Utilitarianism

300

Arguably the strongest form of evidence in a murder trial

Direct evidence

300

"Profit is the most important goal" is an example of a _____ assumption

Value

300

"Two students in 6th period always sleep in class. That class is full of lazy people."

Hasty generalization

300

Believing what aligns with your held views

Confirmation bias

400

"Taller people tend to have larger shoes" is an example of a _____.

correlation

400

Why is inductive reasoning considered imperfect?

Evidence about the past does not guarantee future results

400

"Eating pickles is bad because they are bad for you"

Begging the question (will also take circular reasoning)

400

This framework would insist you keep a promise, even if breaking it would benefit more people.

Deontology

500

Example of indirect evidence that your cat meowed.

Remembering that your cat meowed, someone telling you they meowed...

500

Drawing a conclusion on one thing based on its similarity to another

Argument from analogy

500

"If we allow people to build wind farms, soon they’ll start putting turbines in every backyard, and before you know it, our neighborhoods will be covered in giant windmills."

Reductio ad absurdum

500

Unlike utilitarianism, this framework does not prioritize happiness or consequences when evaluating actions.

Deontology

M
e
n
u