400
Why doesn’t the court need lawyers or witnesses? What does this suggest about the proceedings?
Danforth claims that "the pure in heart need no lawyers" (93). This particular case cannot call upon witnesses because, as Danforth says, "Witchfraft is ipso facto, on its face and by its nature, an invisible crime, is it note? Therefor, who may possibly be witness to it? The witch and the victim. None other" (100). This suggests that the proceedings have no actual evidence and that anybody can wrongly accuse another of witchcraft; it suggests that the court is unfair, biased, and controlled solely by those in charge. This also shows the flaw in a theocracy, where people are held to a moral code as the law.