Judicial System Basics
Supreme Court Cases
Civil Rights & Liberties
Judges & Justices
Speech & Expression
Landmark Decisions & Controversies
100

This branch of government interprets the laws of the United States.

judicial branch

100

This case confirmed the idea of segregation in schools.

Plessy v. Ferguson

100

These are individual freedoms that must be protected from the government.

civil liberties

100

Federal judges are appointed this way.

appointed by the president and approved by the Senate

100

Speech that attempts to overthrow the government or endanger national security.

sedition

100

The Supreme Court must make all decisions based on this.

Constitution

200

The 1789 act that created district and circuit courts to manage the federal caseload.

Judiciary Act of 1789

200

This case gave the judicial branch the power of judicial review.

Marbury v. Madison

200

These rights extend to everyone, and the government ensures they are protected.

civil rights

200

Judges who respect laws as written and adhere to precedent exercise this.

judicial restraint

200

Trying to prevent speech before it is expressed is called this.

prior restraint

200

The current Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.

John Roberts

300

These types of cases are handled by federal courts, involving the U.S. or federal law.

cases against the United States, violations of the Constitution or federal law

300

This case ended segregation in public schools.

Brown v. Board of Education

300

Malicious spoken words are called this.

slander

300

Judges who use their own political or social views to govern their rulings exercise this.

judicial activism

300

Speech expressing ideas through actions is known as this.

symbolic speech

300

The Supreme Court motto found at its entrance.

Equal Justice Under Law

400

The three tiers of the federal court system.

District Courts, Circuit Courts of Appeals, Supreme Court

400

This case allowed school administrators to conduct searches based on reasonable suspicion.

TLO v. New Jersey

400

Malicious written words are called this.

libel

400

Federal judges serve for this length of time.

until retirement, death, or removal by impeachment

400

Speech that involves a genuine threat or incites violence, rather than just endorsing ideas.

clear and present danger test

400

Today, the Supreme Court leans primarily toward this political ideology.

conservative

500

The legal principle that means a defendant is considered innocent until proven guilty.

“innocent until proven guilty”

500

This case guaranteed certain rights for individuals being arrested.

Miranda v. Arizona

500

Being tried for the same crime twice is prohibited by the 5th Amendment.

double jeopardy

500

The modern Supreme Court has this many justices, including one Chief Justice. Name the Chief Justice and at least one other justice.

nine; Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., and eight associate justices: Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. 


500

Favoring individuals who belong to a group that suffered from discrimination is called this.

affirmative action

500

Opinion of a judge that evaluates laws involved, explains the decision, and decides if it should be precedent is called this.

judge’s formal opinion

600

Explain the origins and meaning of the term ‘wall of separation’ when referring to church and state.

Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptists regarding the “wall of separation” between church and state. The phrase is NOWHERE in the Constitution, Declaration, or Bill of Rights

600

The government may restrict only four types of speech:

speech that threatens public safety

speech that attempts to overthrow the government or endanger national security (sedition)

speech that attempts to damage an individual’s reputation or property (slander)

speech that is obscene

600

Evaluate the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. What was the basis of the original ruling? Was this a strong Constitutional argument? Explain. Summarize the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) ruling. Offer your opinion of the Constitutionality of the new ruling.

In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decided that the right to privacy implied in the 14th Amendment protected abortion as a fundamental right.

Argument is weak - privacy is not explicitly stated in the 14th Amendment, or anywhere in the Constitution. The Declaration (a founding document) directly affirms the “right to life”.

Writing for the majority in Dobbs, Justice Samuel Alito said that the only legitimate unenumerated rights (rights not explicitly stated in the Constitution) are those “deeply rooted in the Nation’s history and tradition” and “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.” Abortion, the majority held, is not such a right.

My opinion: 

M
e
n
u