Speaker Roles
General Debate
Argumentative Structure
Key Concepts
General Debate
100

This speaker should mostly only bring arguments

PM

100

Claim, Reasoning, _______, Impact

Evidence

100
Name one thing a argument should have

Pretty obvious

100

What is it when you compare the arguments of both sides?

Weighing

100

This team speaks third in a BP debate.

CG

200

This speaker is tasked with rebutting the Prime Minister and presenting the first opposition case

Leader of Opposition

200

This style of debate features four teams, each with two speakers, competing against each other in one round.

BP

200

Should rebuttal come before or after your arguments?

both are fine

200

What is it when you refute the argument of a opposition?

Rebuttal

200

A willing suspension of disbelief which allows us to pretend that the plan advocated by the affirmative team is possible

Fiat

300

This speaker should not bring any arguments

Any WHIP

300

How many arguments should the PM typically bring

2-3

300

What does CREI stand for?

Claim, Reasoning, Evidence, Assertion

300

What does THW stand for?

This House Would
300

When doing reasoning, what question should you repeatedly ask yourself?

Why is this true?


OR

Why does this matter?

400

This speaker is the first speaker to be able to respond to all opening arguments

MG

400

This is the part of an argument where you explain why it matters in the debate, not just what it is.

impact

400

Which side should bring a counterfactual

Opposition
400

What is a alternate scenario to the motion called?

Counterfactual

400

This term describes a argument that lacks proper reasoning, logic or evidence

Assertion/Claim

500

This speaker has the strategic advantage of responding to all arguments

Opposition Whip
500

What are the four parts of impacts

Scope, Probability, Magnitude, Timeframe

500

Name a type of rebuttal

Invalidility / Mitigation

OR

Direct / Indirect

500

What is thing that PM does where they provide a clear and concise explanation of how the motion would work in practice, defining key terms, and outline the scope of the debate

Framing/Modelling

500

________________ accept that there may be some truth to the argument but that the benefits or harms expressed are exaggerated.

Mitigation rebuttals

M
e
n
u