Cases
Statutes
Doctrines
100

It found qualifications creating disparate impact illegal unless job-related

Griggs

100

One of two statutes that protect against disability discrimination

Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Rehabilitation Act

100

Wards Cove: P must show it in addition to disparate effect

Specific practice causing it or a better method

200

It ruled that disparate impact is shown by comparing the org's workforce to the labor market.

Wards Cove

200

Barring fertile ♀ from jobs with lead violated Title VII and this Act.

Pregnancy Discrimination Act (Johnson Controls)

200

Griggs: This suit is about a neutral rule that affects a protected class more

Disparate impact

300

This case decided ADEA can have a disparate impact claim.

Smith v. City of Jackson

300

One of two valid proofs for a disparate impact case listed in 2000e-2(k) 

specific employment practice not job related; OR complainant shows better method 

300

Dothard: prohibiting women in these jobs is ok.

Contact positions at max security men's prison

400

It nixed discarding gov't exam scores absent strong basis in evidence of deficiency

Ricci

400

This statute does not require business necessity, instead using the concept of RFOA.  

ADEA

400

Disparate impact for this statute includes tests not reflecting impairments

ADA

500

Managers' discretion w/ disparate impact had no common "specific employment practice"

Walmart 

500

There are 7 federal statutes allowing disparate impact claims. Name three.

Title VII, FHA, ADEA, ADA, RA, ECOA, VRA (Voting rts)

500

Hazelwood: appropriate comparision groups for "pattern or practice"

Employer's % of a prot. class and % class in local market 

M
e
n
u