Escalation Path
Evidence & Timeline
Contract Rights
Repair vs Exit
Crisis Communication
100

A vendor support agent has not replied to a P2 ticket within the agreed response time. The service is degraded but not down.

Expected answer: Operational escalation

Strong action: Contact support lead, document missed response, request update.

100

Users report slow service, but the vendor dashboard is green.

Expected answer: Independent evidence collection

Strong action: Capture monitoring, timestamps, screenshots, user reports.

100

The vendor misses an SLA target and the contract defines a service credit.

Expected answer: Service credit claim

Strong action: Calculate credit and request application to invoice.

100

A vendor has one serious outage but responds well, communicates clearly, and provides a strong RCA.

Expected answer: Repair relationship

Strong action: Monitor corrective actions before considering exit.

100

Internal users are affected, but you do not yet know the root cause.

Expected answer: Preliminary communication

Strong action: Communicate impact, workaround, next update time.

200

The same vendor has missed response targets three times this month, but each incident was eventually fixed.

Expected answer: Management escalation

Strong action: Escalate to service manager and demand corrective action plan.

200

The vendor says the outage started at 10:30, but your logs show failures from 09:50.

Expected answer: Incident timeline

Strong action: Build timeline from detection, impact, vendor acknowledgement, restoration.

200

The vendor misses a reporting deadline, but the service itself works.

Expected answer: Non-service performance breach

Strong action: Document breach and escalate through governance.

200

The vendor keeps meeting minimum SLA numbers, but user complaints are rising.

Expected answer: Renegotiate measurement model

Strong action: Add degraded-performance and user-outcome metrics.

200

The vendor tells you not to inform customers until RCA is complete.

Expected answer: Client communication control

Strong action: Communicate known impact without speculating on root cause.

300

The vendor account manager keeps apologizing, but performance is getting worse and the QBR is two months away.

Expected answer: Accelerated governance escalation

Strong action: Call emergency service review before QBR.

300

A vendor claims the failure was caused by your network, but provides no proof.

Expected answer: Fault attribution evidence

Strong action: Request technical evidence and compare against internal logs.

300

The CEO wants termination after one major failure, but the contract requires three critical breaches in six months.

Expected answer: Termination threshold not met

Strong action: Explain limits, preserve evidence, issue formal warning if justified.

300

The vendor repeatedly fails but switching would take nine months.

Expected answer: Repair while preparing exit

Strong action: Demand improvement plan while evaluating replacements.

300

The CEO wants a public statement blaming the vendor immediately.

Expected answer: Controlled external communication

Strong action: Avoid blame until evidence is confirmed.

400

A critical outage affects customer transactions. Vendor support is active, but the vendor refuses to classify it as P1.

Expected answer: Severity dispute escalation

Strong action: Escalate using evidence of business impact and SLA criteria.

400

The vendor restored service but refuses RCA because “the issue is resolved.”

Expected answer: Root cause analysis demand

Strong action: Require RCA with timeline, cause, corrective actions, prevention.

400

The vendor breached a material obligation, but the contract gives them 30 days to fix it.

Expected answer: Cure period

Strong action: Send notice of breach and track cure deadline.

400

The vendor refuses transparency, disputes every incident, and provides weak RCAs.

Expected answer: Trust breakdown

Strong action: Begin exit planning and formal escalation.

400

A regulator may need notification if customer data was affected, but facts are incomplete.

Expected answer: Staged incident communication

Strong action: Notify legal/compliance and prepare conditional reporting path.

500

The vendor repeatedly fails during business-critical periods, executives are angry, and legal wants breach notice. Operations says switching now would be dangerous.

Expected answer: Executive/legal escalation with continuity planning

Strong action: Preserve rights, demand remediation, start exit assessment quietly.

500

A major customer threatens not to renew after repeated degradation that never crossed the formal outage threshold.

Expected answer: Business-impact evidence package

Strong action: Document customer impact, support load, revenue risk, operational disruption.

500

The SLA credits are capped at 20%, but business losses are much higher.

Expected answer: Remedy limitation risk

Strong action: Assess whether damages, renegotiation, or exit rights remain available.

500

The vendor is failing, but no transition plan, data export process, or replacement provider exists.

Expected answer: Exit-readiness failure

Strong action: Build transition plan before attempting termination.

500

Customers demand compensation, the vendor denies breach, and internal teams disagree on impact.

Expected answer: Coordinated crisis messaging

Strong action: Align legal, operations, customer success, and leadership before response.

M
e
n
u