The Power Of Naming
Rewriting The Past
100

Why is everything called "Victory"?

A) They're a low quality product and affordable.

B) Named after his dog 

C) He just wants to make himself feel better

D) They're a good quality product and suck.

A) 

100

Is it possible that you might end up with a job like Winston’s?

A) No, I prefer jobs that value creativity and innovation: I would never engage in altering historical records.

B) Maybe, but it wouldn't be fulfilling: I could work in a similar role, but I wouldn’t find it meaningful.

C) Yes, if societal conditions and roles change: In a future where information control is prioritized, I could find myself in a similar position.

D) No, I am committed to truth and transparency: I would actively avoid any job that promotes deceit or manipulation.

C)

200

Does it make people feel more positive about the future?

A) Victory gives pride to people for buying it 

B) its a fall sense of hope separating from reality 

C) All of the above  

D) Victory makes people feel not worthy of the product 

B)

200

Does this increase the possibility that the record of the past will be changed or lost?

A) Changes in naming have no impact on historical records.

B) Sometimes, but historical records remain intact: Naming may influence contemporary understanding but not alter physical records.

C) Naming conventions can create confusion but ultimately retain historical accuracy.

D) The manipulation of language and naming conventions increases the risk of changing or losing the original context of historical records.

D)

300

What are some examples of this kind of naming in our own society? 

A) A government agency focused on promoting arts and culture.

B) A name suggesting environmental sustainability in corporate policies.

C) A governmental department that manipulates information, akin to Orwell's portrayal in "1984."

D) Community Health Outreach: A program aimed at improving public health in local areas.


C)

300

Is it important to know what the past was really like? Why or why not? 

A) Yes, understanding the past helps us learn from mistakes: Knowledge of true historical events enables us to avoid repeating errors and fosters informed decision-making.

B) No, the past doesn't affect the present: Current issues are unrelated to historical events and do not require context.

C) It depends on personal interest: Some people may find historical accuracy important, while others may not care.

D) Only if it is framed correctly: The past should only be understood with specific narratives to be meaningful.

A)

M
e
n
u