100
9b) Which two pieces of evidence from the blog post support the answer to Part A?
A. “In India, where Andrew Read studies infectious disease, resistance is so prevalent that standard malaria treatment includes not just the pills, but a boy who comes to your home each day to check that you’re taken your dose.” (paragraph 2)
B. “But there is a good argument to be made that the public health message about antibiotics, which is consistent worldwide for many diseases and drugs, deserves a second look.” (paragraph 3)
C. “If you’re the patient, with the newly-boosted resistance mutation, when the next mosquito bites you, she’s going to get a mouthful of resistant bugs, rather than the susceptible ones.” (paragraph 10)
D. “Many guidelines still stand, like preventing transmission in the first place (think hand washing) and eliminating antibiotic use where it’s not necessary: viral infections, for example, and use in livestock.” (paragraph 10)
E. “Evidence shows that many infections clear with less than typical course of antibiotics, which is good since the longer the course, the more chances bugs gt to develop resistance.” (paragraph 17)
F. “Back to those pills in your hand: the evidence isn’t strong enough, yet, for anyone to feel comfortable telling your pharmacist to trash the sticker.” (paragraph 18)
B. “But there is a good argument to be made that the public health message about antibiotics, which is consistent worldwide for many diseases and drugs, deserves a second look.” (paragraph 3)
and
E. “Evidence shows that many infections clear with less than typical course of antibiotics, which is good since the longer the course, the more chances bugs to develop resistance.” (paragraph 17)