Details of the Dilemma
What crimes did the boy commit?
Sexual assault.
The Code of Ethics is made by a certain regulatory body.
What is the Ontario College of Social Workers and Social Service Workers?
How many principles where mentioned?
Five principles.
How many years was the worker working at the Youth Service Bureau for?
20 years.
How many Codes were discussed in this dilemma?
5.
How many footnotes did we address?
Two were address.
How old was the boy chronologically and developmentally?
Chronologically he was 15 and developmentally he was 6 years old.
Which is the main code that obligates the worker to continue working with the client?
The 1st code.
Which principle requires college members to be become aware of their attitudes and values?
Principle 1.5
Why was the setting where the crime took place significant to the worker?
The setting was at a park in his neighbourhood where he frequently took his two daughters to play.
Which code protects the client from the worker telling his neighbours details of the case?
The 6th code.
Which principle addresses that college members cannot discriminate against anyone?
Principle 3.4
What was the parents' response to the boy's incarceration?
This is a trick question. There was no mention of parents in the dilemma.
Which code contradicts itself?
The 11th code.
Which principle would prevent the worker from seeking out vengeful acts against their clients?
Principle 1.6