Relevance & Character Evidence
Witness & Impeachment
Hearsay
Lay vs. Expert Testimony
Documentary Evidence
100

Evidence is considered admissible under this threshold if it makes any fact of consequence more or less probable.

What is relevance?

100

This threshold requirement mandates that a witness have firsthand awareness of what they testify to.

What is personal knowledge?

100

This term refers to a statement made outside of court that is offered to prove the truth of what it asserts.

What is hearsay?

100

These witnesses can offer opinions if they’re based on firsthand knowledge and helpful to the jury.

What are lay witnesses?

100

When proving the content of a document, a party generally must introduce this version.

What is the original document?

200

These types of acts may be admissible to show motive, opportunity, intent, or identity—but not to prove character conformity.

What are prior bad acts?

200

Witnesses must declare to testify truthfully, fulfilling this foundational requirement.

What is the oath or affirmation requirement?

200

This type of prior statement is not hearsay when made by a witness in court who was previously subject to cross-examination.

What is a prior inconsistent statement made under oath?

200

This standard governs whether an expert’s methodology and reasoning are reliable and admissible.

What is the Daubert standard?

200

This form of proof is used when the original document is lost or destroyed.

What is secondary evidence?

300

In civil or criminal sexual misconduct cases, this rule generally bars evidence of the victim’s prior sexual conduct.

What is the rape shield doctrine?

300

To attack a witness’s credibility, a party may offer proof that the witness is biased or has this kind of impairment.

What is sensory or mental defect?

300

These two broad categories determine whether a hearsay exception requires the declarant to be available or not.

What are declarant-available exceptions and declarant-unavailable exceptions?

300

An expert may rely on this kind of information if professionals in the field would normally use it.

What is inadmissible data reasonably relied upon by experts?

300

A copy of a document may be used instead of the original unless this is genuinely in question.

What is the authenticity of the original?

400

A party may offer specific instances of conduct to prove character when this is an actual element of the case.

What is when character is in issue?

400

This form of impeachment involves showing that the witness made inconsistent statements outside of court.

What is impeachment by prior inconsistent statement?

400

This exception allows a statement made during a startling event to be admitted for its truth.

What is an excited utterance?

400

Experts cannot testify about this kind of ultimate issue in a criminal case.

What is a defendant’s mental state or intent?

400

When voluminous records cannot be conveniently examined, a party may use this to summarize them.

What is a summary chart or compilation?

500

Even relevant evidence may be excluded when its probative value is substantially outweighed by dangers like this.

What is unfair prejudice?

500

A party may inquire into these acts on cross-examination if they are probative of the witness’s truthfulness.

What are specific instances of dishonesty or deceit?

500

This exception applies when a declarant makes a statement that would subject them to criminal or civil liability.

What is a statement against interest?

500

This describes a court’s ability to call and examine its own expert.

What is court-appointed expert testimony?

500

A record kept in the regular course of a business may be admissible under this exception.

What is the business records exception?

M
e
n
u