Key Concepts
Facts of the Case
The Appeal
Substantive Equality + IRCAs
100

What is a conditional sentence?

An alternative to prison where an offender serves their sentence in the community under supervision.

100

How much cocaine did Ms. Hamilton smuggle?
a) 489 grams
b) 349 grams
c) 1 kilogram
d) 250 grams

b) 349 grams

100

Why did the Crown appeal the sentences?

They argued the sentences were too lenient and the judge overstepped impartiality.

100

What is substantive equality?

Recognizes systemic barriers and promotes fairness through differential treatment to counter historical disadvantages

200

What are Mitigating Factors

Circumstances like poverty, racial bias, and personal hardships that reduce the offender’s moral blameworthiness (s. 718.2)

200

What was Ms. Mason’s reason for acting as a drug courier?

Financial hardship as a single mother 

200

What did the Crown criticize about Justice Hill’s actions during sentencing?

Introducing his own research and acting as an advocate, which compromised impartiality.

200

What is one example of substantive equality in sentencing?

Considering the historical disadvantages of Indigenous offenders, as seen in the Gladue principles.

300

What does proportionality ensure in sentencing?
a) Equal sentences for all crimes
b) Punishments reflect the seriousness of the crime and the offender’s responsibility
c) Offenders are rehabilitated
d) Sentencing focuses on systemic issues

b) Punishments reflect the seriousness of the crime and the offender’s responsibility

300

Why was Ms. Hamilton’s health at risk during her smuggling attempt?

Cocaine leaked into her bloodstream, making her critically ill.

300

What did the Court of Appeal highlight about sentencing?
a) It should focus on addressing systemic inequality
b) It must prioritize societal reforms
c) It should focus on the offense and offender, not societal wrongs
d) It must always involve incarceration

c) It should focus on the offense and offender, not societal wrongs

300

How does substantive equality differ from formal equality?

Substantive equality addresses systemic barriers and individual disadvantages, while formal equality treats everyone the same, ignoring those barriers.

400

What are typical sentences for Conditional Sentences?

Probation, house arrest, curfews

400

Why did Justice Hill emphasize the women’s family situations?
a) To highlight their need for financial stability
b) To argue that incarceration would harm their children
c) To prove systemic racism was irrelevant
d) To suggest leniency for all drug-related crimes

b) To argue that incarceration would harm their children

400

Why didn’t the Court of Appeal overturn the sentences?

The women had already served most of their conditional sentences, and further incarceration was deemed unnecessary.

400

How do IRCAs help address systemic racism in sentencing?

They link offenders’ experiences to broader societal issues like discrimination in education, housing, and policing.

M
e
n
u