Informal
Other Part 1
Appeals
Other Part 2
Examples
100

Making a personal attack against the person saying the argument, rather than directly addressing the issue.

Ad Hominem

100

Implying a logical connection between two things that doesn't exist. 

Non-Sequitur

100

Believing something is right just because it's been done around for a really long time. 

Appeal to Tradition 

100

Misrepresenting or exaggerating another person's argument to make it easier to attack. 

Strawman Fallacy

100

Chocolate is the best because it's so popular around the world. 

Bandwagon Fallacy

200

Using two different meanings of a word to prove your argument. 

Equivocation

200

Taking an argument to an exaggerated extreme. Predicts events with an extreme conclusion. 

Slippery Slope

200

Trying to persuade someone by manipulating their emotions- such as fear, anger, and ridicule - rather than making a rational case. 

Appeal to Emotions 

200

Thinking an argument must be true because its popular. 

Bandwagon Fallacy

300

Thinking there are two possibilities when there may be other alternatives you haven't considered.

False Dilemma

300

Believing that just because two things happen at the same time, that one must have caused the other.

Correlation Proves Causation 

300

Believing just because an authority or "expert" believes something than it must be true. 

Appeal to Authority

300

Believing something is good or beneficial just because its natural.  

Naturalistic Fallacy

400

A claim made on the basis of insufficient evidence.

Hasty Generalization

400

Thinking that just because something applies to you that it must be true for most people. 

Anecdotal Evidence

400

Thinking a claim is true (or false) because it can't be proven true as true (or false)

Appeal to Ignorance

400

Only choosing a few examples that support your argument, rather than looking at the full picture. 

Cherry Picking

500

When you change the subject to a topic that's easier to attack.

Red Herring 

500

Making an assumption about a specific person based on general tendencies within a group they belong to. 

Ecological Fallacy

500

Making an argument that something is true by repeating the same thing in different words.

Begging the Question 

M
e
n
u